Difference between revisions of "Talk:October Baby"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Top-rate: Once the predictable liberal bias is removed from the reference, it does support the quality of the production of the film.) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Once the predictable liberal bias is removed from the reference, it does support the quality of the production of the film.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:28, 4 April 2012 (EDT) | :Once the predictable liberal bias is removed from the reference, it does support the quality of the production of the film.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:28, 4 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ah, so they '''don't admit''' it! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:30, 4 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, April 4, 2012
Top-rate
- More slickly packaged than most faith-based fare, “October Baby” gussies up its anti-abortion message with gauzy cinematography and more emo music than an entire season of “Grey’s Anatomy.”
- “October Baby” traffics primarily in soapy melodrama and false compassion.
Frankly, that doesn't sound like top-rate to me.
(added reference; note that deletions are disfavored on this site, and references should be sought before deleting material)
Aschlafly, I had read the article in the NY Times, but IMO it doesn't back up the statement that liberals admit that it is a top-rate movie: Should I have labeled my edit trim or clean-up as you do when you are deleting material?
AugustO 11:26, 4 April 2012 (EDT)
- Once the predictable liberal bias is removed from the reference, it does support the quality of the production of the film.--Andy Schlafly 11:28, 4 April 2012 (EDT)
- Ah, so they don't admit it! AugustO 11:30, 4 April 2012 (EDT)