Difference between revisions of "Naomi Riley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(an affiliate scholar of the Institute of American Values) |
(The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/299765/censoring-naomi-riley-john-fund# Censoring Naomi Riley] - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious | *[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/299765/censoring-naomi-riley-john-fund# Censoring Naomi Riley] - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious | ||
| + | *[http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/the-most-persuasive-case-for-eliminating-black-studies-just-read-the-dissertations/46346 The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations] - Naomi Schaefer Riley | ||
Revision as of 21:06, May 14, 2012
Naomi Riley is an affiliate scholar of the Institute of American Values, an author and former blogger for the Chronicle of Higher Education. She has written "two substantive books" on higher education.
After being fired for writing a blog entry that attracted criticism, Riley wrote:
- If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and George Zimmerman, it is because black studies is a cause, not a course of study. [1]
External links
- Censoring Naomi Riley - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious
- The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations - Naomi Schaefer Riley