Difference between revisions of "Naomi Riley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations) |
(the C H E fired Riley "for writing a piece at variance with the political correctness it has come to uphold) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
After being fired for writing a blog entry that attracted criticism, Riley wrote: | After being fired for writing a blog entry that attracted criticism, Riley wrote: | ||
* If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of [[Fox News]], ''The Wall Street Journal'', [[Newt Gingrich]], [[Rick Santorum]] and [[George Zimmerman]], it is because [[black studies]] is a cause, not a course of study. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304363104577391842133259230.html?mod=googlenews_wsj] | * If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of [[Fox News]], ''The Wall Street Journal'', [[Newt Gingrich]], [[Rick Santorum]] and [[George Zimmerman]], it is because [[black studies]] is a cause, not a course of study. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304363104577391842133259230.html?mod=googlenews_wsj] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abraham Miller said the ''Chronicle'' fired Riley "for writing a piece at variance with the [[political correctness]] it has come to uphold." [http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/naomi_schaefer_riley_and_the_corruption_of_the_academy.html Naomi Schaefer Riley and the Corruption of the Academy] - Abraham H. Miller | ||
| + | |||
| + | Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/naomi_schaefer_riley_and_the_corruption_of_the_academy.html#ixzz1ut5MeXtw | ||
| + | |||
| + | Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/naomi_schaefer_riley_and_the_corruption_of_the_academy.html#ixzz1ut54VNkb | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/299765/censoring-naomi-riley-john-fund# Censoring Naomi Riley] - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious | *[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/299765/censoring-naomi-riley-john-fund# Censoring Naomi Riley] - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious | ||
*[http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/the-most-persuasive-case-for-eliminating-black-studies-just-read-the-dissertations/46346 The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations] - Naomi Schaefer Riley | *[http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/the-most-persuasive-case-for-eliminating-black-studies-just-read-the-dissertations/46346 The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations] - Naomi Schaefer Riley | ||
Revision as of 22:54, May 14, 2012
Naomi Riley is an affiliate scholar of the Institute of American Values, an author and former blogger for the Chronicle of Higher Education. She has written "two substantive books" on higher education.
After being fired for writing a blog entry that attracted criticism, Riley wrote:
- If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and George Zimmerman, it is because black studies is a cause, not a course of study. [1]
Abraham Miller said the Chronicle fired Riley "for writing a piece at variance with the political correctness it has come to uphold." Naomi Schaefer Riley and the Corruption of the Academy - Abraham H. Miller
External links
- Censoring Naomi Riley - She was fired for having the courage to state the obvious
- The Most Persuasive Case for Eliminating Black Studies? Just Read the Dissertations - Naomi Schaefer Riley