Difference between revisions of "User talk:DamianJohn"
(Blanked the page) |
m (Reverted edits by BUMloving (talk) to last revision by DamianJohn) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Hi Damian, you joined conservapedia before me however let me welcome you! | ||
| + | The reason I post here is to let you know, as you created the page, that I made some changes to the Destiny Church page. | ||
| + | Just a heads up! God bless.[[User:JJacob|JJacob]] 22:14, 5 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Got your message. A few people argue with some of my edits too, although I do try to go by what the better historians have to say. | ||
| + | :Best wishes.[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 19:39, 16 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == World history guide == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The basics are just about done, huh?--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 18:18, 20 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Yeah we have done pretty well. I'm gonna keep adding to the more advanced stuff when I get spare time. It is hard to get into a sentence or two basic information and something interesting as well. I have learnt a few things (eg I thought the Huns were from Germany - apparently not). --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 22:53, 20 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Yeah. I'll help you with that soon.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:54, 20 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | == Tonight == | ||
| + | : Final of the Tri-Nations. Kiwi in Oz makes me nervous [[User:Aortuso|Aortuso]] 22:40, 26 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Yes indeed. I think we should be too strong but you never know with those wily Aussies. Hosea Gear unlucky to miss out but still a pretty good team. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 23:11, 26 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Extra privileges granted == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Congratulations, the additional privileges of blocking and rolling back have been added to your account!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:11, 14 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Courtesy and decorum== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please do not pick fights with other contributors. After you've made your point, move on. Rob Smith is an old friend. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:15, 2 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :I am sorry Ed that you feel I have picked a fight with Rob. I do not think that is a fair appraisal of the situation. Rob and I have had a love/hate relationship for perhaps as long as you have, and he is well aware that his continual insulting of me and my country was inappropriate behaviour for THIS site. The matter has been dealt with and I am not entirely sure why you have chosen to fan the flames more. In any case I shall assume that you act in good faith and will let the matter drop; confused as I am by your input. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 00:22, 3 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == April 2012 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for your contributions here at Conservapedia. May I ask, what inspired [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ESPN&diff=971238&oldid=732525 this]? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 01:12, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Yes of course. It was this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageleft&action=historysubmit&diff=971165&oldid=970924 edit by Andy Schlafly]. There was some doubt raised subsequently about the correct interpretation of that posting, and although I personally was sceptical about Andy's claim, I thought it was appropriate that the views of the site leader and owner be reflected with the articles. We are, as I'm sure you appreciate, here merely at the leisure of the site owner. Our role is to facilitate the articulation of those views, whether we personally agree with them or not. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:26, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Well-deserved promotion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Congratulations - your account has been promoted!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:28, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Context-free grammar == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi Damian, | ||
| + | You commented recently that [[Context-free grammar]] was currently a "a list of gobbledygook" (I agree with your comments). | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just about finished working on [[Chomsky hierarchy]], which involves the same sort of things as [[Context-free grammar]]. Could I ask you to have a look at [[Chomsky hierarchy]] and let me know if it is perhaps a little more accessible to the average reader (any constructive comments are welcome). If you are happy with my style and level of writing, then I intend to turn my hand to rewriting [[Context-free grammar]] in a similar vein. [[User:RolandPlankton|RolandPlankton]] 15:15, 10 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Looks good to me. Well done. I have been very busy the past few weeks so I haven't been around. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:32, 12 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:47, May 26, 2012
Hi Damian, you joined conservapedia before me however let me welcome you! The reason I post here is to let you know, as you created the page, that I made some changes to the Destiny Church page. Just a heads up! God bless.JJacob 22:14, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
- Got your message. A few people argue with some of my edits too, although I do try to go by what the better historians have to say.
- Best wishes.Pluto 19:39, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
World history guide
The basics are just about done, huh?--JamesWilson 18:18, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah we have done pretty well. I'm gonna keep adding to the more advanced stuff when I get spare time. It is hard to get into a sentence or two basic information and something interesting as well. I have learnt a few things (eg I thought the Huns were from Germany - apparently not). --DamianJohn 22:53, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah. I'll help you with that soon.--JamesWilson 22:54, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
Tonight
- Final of the Tri-Nations. Kiwi in Oz makes me nervous Aortuso 22:40, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
- Yes indeed. I think we should be too strong but you never know with those wily Aussies. Hosea Gear unlucky to miss out but still a pretty good team. --DamianJohn 23:11, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
Extra privileges granted
Congratulations, the additional privileges of blocking and rolling back have been added to your account!--Andy Schlafly 16:11, 14 January 2012 (EST)
Courtesy and decorum
Please do not pick fights with other contributors. After you've made your point, move on. Rob Smith is an old friend. --Ed Poor Talk 22:15, 2 February 2012 (EST)
- I am sorry Ed that you feel I have picked a fight with Rob. I do not think that is a fair appraisal of the situation. Rob and I have had a love/hate relationship for perhaps as long as you have, and he is well aware that his continual insulting of me and my country was inappropriate behaviour for THIS site. The matter has been dealt with and I am not entirely sure why you have chosen to fan the flames more. In any case I shall assume that you act in good faith and will let the matter drop; confused as I am by your input. --DamianJohn 00:22, 3 February 2012 (EST)
April 2012
Thank you for your contributions here at Conservapedia. May I ask, what inspired this? DMorris 01:12, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
- Yes of course. It was this edit by Andy Schlafly. There was some doubt raised subsequently about the correct interpretation of that posting, and although I personally was sceptical about Andy's claim, I thought it was appropriate that the views of the site leader and owner be reflected with the articles. We are, as I'm sure you appreciate, here merely at the leisure of the site owner. Our role is to facilitate the articulation of those views, whether we personally agree with them or not. --DamianJohn 17:26, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
Well-deserved promotion
Congratulations - your account has been promoted!--Andy Schlafly 18:28, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
Context-free grammar
Hi Damian, You commented recently that Context-free grammar was currently a "a list of gobbledygook" (I agree with your comments).
I just about finished working on Chomsky hierarchy, which involves the same sort of things as Context-free grammar. Could I ask you to have a look at Chomsky hierarchy and let me know if it is perhaps a little more accessible to the average reader (any constructive comments are welcome). If you are happy with my style and level of writing, then I intend to turn my hand to rewriting Context-free grammar in a similar vein. RolandPlankton 15:15, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
- Looks good to me. Well done. I have been very busy the past few weeks so I haven't been around. --DamianJohn 21:32, 12 May 2012 (EDT)