4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + + + +
no edit summary
:I absolutely love when somebody tries to use scripture against Christians. But it matters most when you use scripture against non-believers. I bet you would condemn the translation of the bible from Latin to English. Move along trouble maker.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:39, 1 June 2012 (EDT)
:I absolutely love when somebody tries to use scripture against Christians. But it matters most when you use scripture against non-believers. I bet you would condemn the translation of the bible from Latin to English. Move along trouble maker.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:39, 1 June 2012 (EDT)
I don't believe that addresses my point. This article condemns Mr. Shlafly's behavior! Mr. Shlafly wants to remove passages from the Bible because of their liberal nature. Yet, this page quotes Jesus as saying man must live by ALL of God's Word. Apparently, Mr. Shlafly doesn't want to do that. "The counterargument of many cafeteria Christians is that the word of the authors of certain parts of the Bible is not necessarily the word of God." Then, this page deems this argument circular! Isn't that Mr. Shlafly's argument? You're arguing with yourselves!
"If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand." - Mark 3:25
Perhaps I should take my complaints to the Bible Project page instead... - quidestveritas