Difference between revisions of "User talk:Crzyclarks"
Crzyclarks (talk | contribs) |
(→Block: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What's wrong with the source? How about you come up with a source that will even come close to showing scientific consensus for your edit. [[User:Crzyclarks|Crzyclarks]] 22:45, 4 June 2012 (EDT) | What's wrong with the source? How about you come up with a source that will even come close to showing scientific consensus for your edit. [[User:Crzyclarks|Crzyclarks]] 22:45, 4 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Block == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dear User:Crzyclarks, I noticed that you were recently blocked by User:Conservative. Since you are a new user, I am going to reduce your block so you can edit again in a few days. In the future, please take care to discuss your changes with the user who reverted you, rather than [[Edit war|edit warring]]. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 21:06, 9 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:06, June 10, 2012
"Previous version was rife with inaccuracies/assumptions"...so you can change it to include your inaccuracies/assumptions? I've seen the only source your provided: a silly "we-the-undersigned" statement which proves nothing except what they want to believe. This website is not going to call their little fairy-tale a fact...not in the least. Karajou 22:39, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
What's wrong with the source? How about you come up with a source that will even come close to showing scientific consensus for your edit. Crzyclarks 22:45, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
Block
Dear User:Crzyclarks, I noticed that you were recently blocked by User:Conservative. Since you are a new user, I am going to reduce your block so you can edit again in a few days. In the future, please take care to discuss your changes with the user who reverted you, rather than edit warring. With regards, AnupamTalk 21:06, 9 June 2012 (EDT)