Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4,905 bytes added ,  18:25, June 12, 2012
an assignment for you
Line 13: Line 13:  
Another Liberal
 
Another Liberal
   −
== Uhh ==
+
== Man's downhill genetic slide - human genetic entropy ==
   −
If you're gay, why are u here? Seriously, go to a gay bar or something fun, not here with the saddest people on earth. God
+
Evolutionist source:
 +
 
 +
I just discovered evolutionist Michael Lynch admitting this in the ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America'' in a December 3, 2009 article entitled: ''Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation'' (taken from the abstract): "Finally, a consideration of the long-term consequences of current human behavior for deleterious-mutation accumulation leads to the conclusion that a substantial reduction in human fitness can be expected over the next few centuries in industrialized societies unless novel means of genetic intervention are developed." [http://www.pnas.org/content/107/3/961]
 +
 
 +
Creationist sources:
 +
 
 +
Here are some additional resources concerning the issue of genetic entropy: [http://blindinglight.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/genetic-entropy/ Genetic entropy] and [http://www.mathematicsofevolution.com/ChaptersMath/Chapter_190__Genetic_Entropy__.html Genetic entropy] and [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/respected-cornell-geneticist-rejects-darwinism-in-his-recent-book/ Respected Cornell geneticist rejects Darwinism in his recent book] and [http://www.tccsa.tc/articles/genetic_entropy.html Review of J. C. Sanford's Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome] and [http://advindicate.com/?p=917 Genetic entropy: a literal fall from perfection]. Also, here are a few videos: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ-4umGkgos Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome" 1/2] and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8KbM-xkfVk Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome" 2/2] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:15, 18 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== re: Shockofgod ==
 +
 
 +
I just heard that [[Shockofgod]] has had a member of his family become ill. I am guessing you may have had a hard time reaching him. From what I heard, I am guessing that in about a week or two, you may find it easier to contact him. I would visit his free chat room in about a week or so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:17, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::I am sorry to hear that.  Thank you for letting me know.  I will contact him then. --[[User:JHunter|JHunter]] 19:02, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::Shockofgod (and probably an admin of his debate room called "vivaromones" who is very much interested in biology) has resumed debating the 15 questions for evolutionists of the [[Question evolution! campaign]].  I heard a debate is happening today.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:09, 10 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::::Shockofgod is in his chat room now. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:19, 10 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Well Done ==
 +
 
 +
Hello JHunter, great job with your article on [[Developmental biology]]! Are you planning on creating more articles relating to biology? Perhaps we can start a WikiProject Biology if you're interested! Let me know! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 18:59, 8 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
:For your information, you are welcome to participate in [[Wikiproject:Biology]]. Cheers, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 15:43, 9 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
== Re:Wikiprojects Biology and Medicine  ==
 +
 
 +
Dear User:JHunter, thanks for your message. Indeed, there are several biology and medicine related articles that could use improvement. If you search through [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Biology Category:Biology], you can find many of the biology-related articles to work on. In the future, if you could format the references in the same fashion as I did for the article on [[Desmin]], that might be helpful. As far as the [[evolution]] article, it is dubious that any changes you might want to introduce to the article would be accepted, keeping in mind [[CP:CPOV]]. You could consider improving the article on [[evolutionary creation]], however; [http://biologos.org/ The Biologos Foundation], founded by [[Francis Collins]], is a proponent of this view. Nevertheless, there are numerous other articles that need improvement in the fields of cell biology, molecular biology, genetics, microbiology, immunology, etc. As I am very busy in real life, I will try to contribute when I can. However, I warmly welcome your efforts to improve biology and medicine related articles on Conservapedia. I have worked with User:Conservative before and I am sure that if you ask him kindly, he will let you maintain references to evolution in the articles that you are working on, granted that you qualify them with "mainstream scientists theorize" or something of the like. Alternatively, he could insert something about what creation scientists believe on the subject. Hopefully this is helpful! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]<sup>[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]</sup> 20:55, 9 June 2012 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
==Simpler articles ==
 +
 
 +
Can you explain biology topics in a way that junior high or high school students can understand what you're saying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:25, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu