Difference between revisions of "National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(a start) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In '''''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius''''' (June 28, 2012), and related cases, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[ObamaCare]] was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the [[Commerce Clause]], but was a valid exercise of the Taxing Power of [[Congress]]. | In '''''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius''''' (June 28, 2012), and related cases, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[ObamaCare]] was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the [[Commerce Clause]], but was a valid exercise of the Taxing Power of [[Congress]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Left Unaddressed by the Opinion == | ||
| + | *whether ObamaCare is constitutional under the [[Takings Clause]] of the [[Fifth Amendment]] | ||
| + | *whether the passage of ObamaCare violated the [[Presentment Clause]] | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 00:56, July 4, 2012
In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (June 28, 2012), and related cases, the U.S. Supreme Court held that ObamaCare was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause, but was a valid exercise of the Taxing Power of Congress.
Left Unaddressed by the Opinion
- whether ObamaCare is constitutional under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment
- whether the passage of ObamaCare violated the Presentment Clause