Difference between revisions of "Skepchick"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Criticism of Skepchick: | Criticism of Skepchick: | ||
| − | *[http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/not-your-average-read/2011/jul/16/sexism-atheism-Dawkins-Watson-feminists-Skepchick/ Of sexism and atheism: Richard Dawkins gets in trouble with feminists - ''Washington Times'', July 16, 2011 | + | *[http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/not-your-average-read/2011/jul/16/sexism-atheism-Dawkins-Watson-feminists-Skepchick/ Of sexism and atheism: Richard Dawkins gets in trouble with feminists] - ''Washington Times'', July 16, 2011 |
*[http://mirandaceleste.net/2011/07/07/theres-nothing-skeptical-about-the-skepchicks-vicious-campaign/ There’s nothing skeptical about the Skepchicks’ vicious “campaign”] | *[http://mirandaceleste.net/2011/07/07/theres-nothing-skeptical-about-the-skepchicks-vicious-campaign/ There’s nothing skeptical about the Skepchicks’ vicious “campaign”] | ||
Revision as of 15:51, July 11, 2012
Skepchick is an atheist website founded by Rebecca Watson which discusses atheism, feminism, science, and pseudoscience. Being an atheist website, Skepchick advocates evolutionary pseudoscience. In 2009, it was reported that the website consists of 16 female writers and one male writer.[1]
See also
External links
Criticism of Skepchick:
- Of sexism and atheism: Richard Dawkins gets in trouble with feminists - Washington Times, July 16, 2011
- There’s nothing skeptical about the Skepchicks’ vicious “campaign”