Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Richard Dawkins and peanut butter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(without a specific reason, this would simply be "trolling") |
(a response) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Could you make your criticism more specific, please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:16, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | :Could you make your criticism more specific, please? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:16, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Why this page is beyond substandard and quite frankly embarrassing: | ||
| + | ::* It is not actually an essay. It is actually a collection of captioned pictures and links. In fact, there are no words in it that are not links or captions to pictures. | ||
| + | ::* It claims that one's "machismo" is linked to one's preference in peanut butter, despite no link ever being shows between the two. | ||
| + | ::* The main thesis, that Richard Dawkins likes creamy peanut butter, has never been proven anywhere. | ||
| + | ::* Other main points of this piece, like the claims that Chuck Norris and John Wayne enjoy/enjoyed chunky peanut butter, have never been proven. | ||
| + | ::* Large components of it, namely the bunny and bullfighting pictures, have been used in countless other "essays" by User:Conservative and don't really prove anything. | ||
| + | ::Ed Poor, if you can't see that this page is an utter embarassment to the readers and editors of Conservapedia, then I don't know what else to say. I am interested in hearing your defense of this article. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 11:20, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:20, July 14, 2012
Man this page is insane. :) Cmurphynz 08:42, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
- Why this page is beyond substandard and quite frankly embarrassing:
- It is not actually an essay. It is actually a collection of captioned pictures and links. In fact, there are no words in it that are not links or captions to pictures.
- It claims that one's "machismo" is linked to one's preference in peanut butter, despite no link ever being shows between the two.
- The main thesis, that Richard Dawkins likes creamy peanut butter, has never been proven anywhere.
- Other main points of this piece, like the claims that Chuck Norris and John Wayne enjoy/enjoyed chunky peanut butter, have never been proven.
- Large components of it, namely the bunny and bullfighting pictures, have been used in countless other "essays" by User:Conservative and don't really prove anything.
- Ed Poor, if you can't see that this page is an utter embarassment to the readers and editors of Conservapedia, then I don't know what else to say. I am interested in hearing your defense of this article. AndrewTompkins 11:20, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
- Why this page is beyond substandard and quite frankly embarrassing: