Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gallery of obese Christians"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Should Santa be included? He is fictional, so he is not actually a Christian (or of any religion, for that matter). [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 22:40, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | Should Santa be included? He is fictional, so he is not actually a Christian (or of any religion, for that matter). [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 22:40, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
| − | I guess you haven't heard of St. Nick. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:50, 14 July 2012 (EDT) | + | :I guess you haven't heard of St. Nick. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:50, 14 July 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:50, July 15, 2012
For similar reasons as Gallery of obese atheists (see Conservapedia:AFD Gallery of obese atheists). It appears to have no encyclopedic merit and is offensive to Christians who, for whatever reason, are overweight. Additionally, it seems that this page was created as a troll/parody of Gallery of obese atheists; regardless of the merits of the latter article, creating a parody article in the encyclopedia is not appropriate. GregG 19:33, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
- I disagree. I have quite vocally protested the Gallery of obese atheists, but the article has been supported by the CP admins, so I can only assume that being offensive to fat people is acceptable here. The GOA article implies that fat people are atheists - it's only fair to imply that fat people can be Christians (or Jewish or... etc.) SharonW 19:55, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
- I created this page. It is not a "troll/parody" of "Gallery of obese atheists". It's a demonstration that if one is valid here, the other is too; and, I hope, that neither is valid. They're both stupid. CasparRH 21:52, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
Santa Claus
Should Santa be included? He is fictional, so he is not actually a Christian (or of any religion, for that matter). AndrewTompkins 22:40, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
- I guess you haven't heard of St. Nick. --Jpatt 22:50, 14 July 2012 (EDT)