Difference between revisions of "Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→See also) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) m (→Transcendental argument for the existence of God: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.gotquestions.org → https://www.gotquestions.org) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|250px|Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|cancellation]] of their scheduled debate.<ref>[ | + | [[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|250px|Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man [[atheism|atheists]] fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s [[Press release concerning Michael Martin pulling out of Martin-Bahnsen debate|cancellation]] of their scheduled debate.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=O1gPpUMzcEQC&pg=PA286&lpg=PA286&dq=%22the+man+atheists+fear+most%22+bahnsen&source=bl&ots=PyGQBd8Xrl&sig=ACfU3U1DpS53GaAc_ZfKLnfD6jrP1gozDQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQqrLRu6vgAhXIqlkKHfuaBcQQ6AEwCHoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22the%20man%20atheists%20fear%20most%22%20bahnsen&f=false Pushing the Antithesis] on Greg Bahnsen</ref>]] |
| − | '''Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God''' is an argument developed by Michael Martin, in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars. | + | '''Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God''' (TANG) is an argument developed by [[Michael Martin]], in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars. |
| − | It was made to counter the much older [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]]. | + | It was made to counter the much older [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]] (TAG). |
| + | |||
| + | Martin was criticized by the defenders of TAG for his 11th hour pulling out of his 1994 scheduled debate with Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] (See: [[Press release after Michael Martin pulled out of Martin-Bahnsen debate]]).<ref>[http://simpleapologetics.com/thegreatdebate.html The Great Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein]</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.<ref>[http://www.reformed.org/apologetics/martin_TAG.html Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin]</ref><ref>[https://carm.org/answering-transcendental-argument-non-existence-god Answering the Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God] by Matt Slick at [[CARM]]</ref> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| − | *[[Atheism | + | *[[Atheism and irrationality]] |
== External links == | == External links == | ||
=== Transcendental argument for the existence of God === | === Transcendental argument for the existence of God === | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | *[ | + | ''See also:'' [[Transcendental argument for the existence of God]] |
| + | |||
| + | *[https://www.gotquestions.org/transcendental-argument.html What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God?] | ||
*[http://www.reformed.org/apologetics/index.html?mainframe=/apologetics/martin_TAG.html Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin] | *[http://www.reformed.org/apologetics/index.html?mainframe=/apologetics/martin_TAG.html Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin] | ||
| + | *[https://carm.org/answering-transcendental-argument-non-existence-god Answering the Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God] by Matt Slick at [[CARM]] | ||
*[http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/plantinga_alvin/naturalism_defeated.pdf Naturalism Defeated] A recent transcendental argument by [[Alvin Plantinga]]. | *[http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/plantinga_alvin/naturalism_defeated.pdf Naturalism Defeated] A recent transcendental argument by [[Alvin Plantinga]]. | ||
| − | |||
*[http://www.butler-harris.org/tag The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence] by Michael Butler. | *[http://www.butler-harris.org/tag The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence] by Michael Butler. | ||
*[http://carm.org/transcendental-argument The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God] by Matt Slick. | *[http://carm.org/transcendental-argument The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God] by Matt Slick. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
==== Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God ==== | ==== Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God ==== | ||
| − | * [http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/greg-bahnsen-vs-gordon-stein-the-great-debate/ "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?"] or [ | + | * [http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/greg-bahnsen-vs-gordon-stein-the-great-debate/ "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?"] or [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1hSx2evTGM The Great Debate: Does God Exist?] (YouTube video) - Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] versus Dr. Gordon Stein - Audio of a formal debate between Christian Greg Bahnsen and skeptic Gordon Stein at the University of California, Irvine. |
* [http://www.frame-poythress.org/debate-with-michael-martin-on-the-transcendental-argument-for-the-non-existence-of-god/ The Martin-Frame Debate] A written debate between skeptic [[Michael Martin]] and Christian John Frame on the transcendental argument for the existence of God. | * [http://www.frame-poythress.org/debate-with-michael-martin-on-the-transcendental-argument-for-the-non-existence-of-god/ The Martin-Frame Debate] A written debate between skeptic [[Michael Martin]] and Christian John Frame on the transcendental argument for the existence of God. | ||
* [http://reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/v2n4/ "Is Non-Christian Thought Futile?"] A written debate between Christian Doug Jones and skeptics Keith Parsons and Michael Martin in ''Antithesis'' magazine (vol. 2, no. 4). | * [http://reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/v2n4/ "Is Non-Christian Thought Futile?"] A written debate between Christian Doug Jones and skeptics Keith Parsons and Michael Martin in ''Antithesis'' magazine (vol. 2, no. 4). | ||
Latest revision as of 23:17, April 9, 2019
Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[1]
Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God (TANG) is an argument developed by Michael Martin, in which he claims logic, morality, and science, are incompatible with Christianity, it has been countered and criticized by several scholars.
It was made to counter the much older Transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG).
Martin was criticized by the defenders of TAG for his 11th hour pulling out of his 1994 scheduled debate with Dr. Greg Bahnsen (See: Press release after Michael Martin pulled out of Martin-Bahnsen debate).[2]
Martin released his TANG argument in 1996 after Greg Bahnsen died in 1995.[3][4]
Contents
See also
External links
Transcendental argument for the existence of God
See also: Transcendental argument for the existence of God
- What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God?
- Responses to Atheist Philosopher, Michael Martin
- Answering the Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God by Matt Slick at CARM
- Naturalism Defeated A recent transcendental argument by Alvin Plantinga.
- The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence by Michael Butler.
- The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God by Matt Slick.
Debates on the transcendental argument for the existence of God
- "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?" or The Great Debate: Does God Exist? (YouTube video) - Dr. Greg Bahnsen versus Dr. Gordon Stein - Audio of a formal debate between Christian Greg Bahnsen and skeptic Gordon Stein at the University of California, Irvine.
- The Martin-Frame Debate A written debate between skeptic Michael Martin and Christian John Frame on the transcendental argument for the existence of God.
- "Is Non-Christian Thought Futile?" A written debate between Christian Doug Jones and skeptics Keith Parsons and Michael Martin in Antithesis magazine (vol. 2, no. 4).
