Difference between revisions of "Talk:Romanization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Blackjuice (Talk); changed back to last version by Dikaiosune)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 
==Pinyin vs Wade-Giles==
 
==Pinyin vs Wade-Giles==
  
Line 4: Line 5:
  
 
[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 20 March 2007
 
[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 20 March 2007
−
 
−
::Wade-Giles is considered inaccurate by many scholars, and it should also be noted that the Republic of China no longer uses Wade-Giles, but instead a system known as Tongyong Pinyin.  This system is very similar to hanyu pinyin and is taught in exactly the same way.
 

Latest revision as of 21:54, August 4, 2007

Pinyin vs Wade-Giles

There needs to be discussion in all articles relating to China whether to use Pinyin or Wade-Giles. I have fixed the factual error in this article that promoted Wade-Giles, namely because Pinyin has been accepted and has superseded Wade-Giles in the United States.

Dikaiosune 20 March 2007