Difference between revisions of "User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt"

Latest revision as of 21:13, April 1, 2016

re: Anthony Weiner article and also the issue of fighting between User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano

TO: User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano

As far as the Anthony Weiner article, I will admit that the term "gun grabbing" is not encyclopedic. Strong advocate of gun control or similar phraseology would be more appropriate. It is not appropriate to remove all references to his policy on guns.

Second, making a big deal about his Jewish religion in the first 7 words of an article is not appropriate either. However, totally removing all references to his religion is not helpful either. While I am not a fan of Wikipedia, they typically list a politician's religious persuasion (Baptist, Presbyterian, Jewish, Muslim, atheism, etc.). I do think giving this information is helpful to readers.

User: JDano and User: TheAmericanRedoubt need to work more cooperatively.

Due to time constraints, I am asking User: Karajou and the owner of this website to referee if necessary. I sincerely hope this is not necessary. You both seem to be intelligent individuals. Please start behaving more cooperatively. I know you are both capable of doing so. Conservative (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

I put this post on User: JDano's talk page: I was told by TAR that you are User: Wsacht or a member of a wiki that opposes this wiki. I told him that I thought this was not the case. Your terse comment on the talk page of the The Survival Blog article does not reassure me that TAR was not correct about this matter. You also seem a bit obsessed with TARs past editing. Again, I don't have the time or inclination to be a referee. Do your best to get along with TAR. I have told TAR to improve in some matters too (please see his talk page). I will also say that User: Wsacht used to put on a veneer of politeness, but when you did a little more investigation, it became apparent it was merely a veneer. I hope User: JDano is not a sock of User: Wsacht. Conservative (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

A few last comments

I do think that hard times are coming (probably in about 15-20 years). So preparedness is a good thing. I know you got a lot of flack about this matter. I have always been fond of the Boy Scout motto though: "Be prepared". And I have never been fond of the Nannystate.

Sorry to see you go. If you do change your mind, please keep what I said in mind as far as content formatting (not overdoing internal links, etc. ). Conservative (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2016 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 23:36, 30 March 2014 (EDT)}}
+== re: Anthony Weiner article and also the issue of fighting between User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano  ==
-Hi [[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]]. Thanks. I have read it. Did I do something wrong in my edits?  Thanks.
+TO: User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano
-==ISP use only==
+As far as the Anthony Weiner article, I will admit that the term "gun grabbing" is not encyclopedic. Strong advocate of gun control or similar phraseology would be more appropriate.  It is not appropriate to remove all references to his policy on guns.
-You will cease from using proxies to access the site. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:05, 25 April 2014 (EDT)
-:Maybe his IP address is blocked due to no fault of his own. Andy could unblock it if we had an email for him to write to as far as him giving Andy his IP address. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 06:15, 25 April 2014 (EDT)
-::I sent you an e-mail, my ISP's IP is blocked. I blanked my IP address here for security reasons.
-From:
-To:  cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com
-Subj:  User_talk:TheAmericanRedoubt - Proxy due to blocked ISP address
-Date:  Fri, 25 Apr 2014 06:07:00 -0600
-Good morning User:Karajou and User:Conservative.
-Please unblock my dedicated IP address of __________.
-I have been enjoying editing and contributing to Conservapedia (my
+Second, making a big deal about his Jewish religion in the first 7 words of an article is not appropriate either. However, totally removing all references to his religion is not helpful either. While I am not a fan of Wikipedia, they typically list a politician's religious persuasion (Baptist, Presbyterian, Jewish, Muslim, atheism, etc.).  I do think giving this information is helpful to readers.
-favorite source for Conservative viewpoints-news-knowledge).
-However, early on after creating my user account
-(User_talk:TheAmericanRedoubt) my dedicated ISP address of
-________________ was blocked and I was forced to sign up for a VPN-
-Proxy in order to even see the site. I get a "Error 118
-(net::ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT): The operation timed out."
-No one else at my ISP uses my IP address since I pay extra each
+User: JDano and User: TheAmericanRedoubt need to work more cooperatively.
-month to have it dedicated to just me.  I have been with that ISP
-since Dec. 2013.
-I would love to continue working on content. For now, as I peruse
+Due to time constraints, I am asking User: Karajou and the owner of this website to referee if necessary. I sincerely hope this is not necessary. You both seem to be intelligent individuals. Please start behaving more cooperatively. I know you are both capable of doing so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:52, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
-each article of interest, I just correct spelling errors-typos and
+:I put this post on User: JDano's talk page: I was told by TAR that you are User: Wsacht or a member of a wiki that opposes this wiki.  I told him that I thought this was not the case. Your terse comment on the talk page of the The Survival Blog article does not reassure me that TAR was not correct about this matter. You also seem a bit obsessed with TARs past editing. Again, I don't have the time or inclination to be a referee. Do your best to get along with TAR. I have told TAR to improve in some matters too (please see his talk page). I will also say that User: Wsacht used to put on a veneer of politeness, but when you did a little more investigation, it became apparent it was merely a veneer. I hope User: JDano is not a sock of User: Wsacht. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:20, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
-adding hyperlinks or See Also as appropriate based on
-Conservapedia:Quick_reference and
-Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages until I can slowly
-establish to you administrators my sincerity and respect for this great resource.
-Thank you in advance for unblocking my address.
+== A few last comments ==
-God bless.
-Sincerely,
-[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt]] 17:09, 26 April 2014 (EDT)
-== Redirect pages ==
+I do think that hard times are coming (probably in about 15-20 years).  So preparedness is a good thing.  I know you got a lot of flack about this matter. I have always been fond of the Boy Scout motto though: "Be prepared". And I have never been fond of the Nannystate.
-Please place a lower priority on redirect pages and focus more on content creation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 06:10, 25 April 2014 (EDT)
+Sorry to see you go. If you do change your mind, please keep what I said in mind as far as content formatting (not overdoing internal links, etc. ). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:12, 1 April 2016 (EDT)
-== Communist Party USA ==
-Hello,
-I noticed that you added [[:Category:Communist Party USA]] to several pages.  Please bear in mind that [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandment #1]] applies to categories, and take special care to ensure that the categories of articles about living people do not include defamatory or unsourced content.  Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:36, 3 November 2014 (EST)
-Thank you for the advice, I will keep that in mind. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]]
-== Orphaned Pages ==
-Hi, I see you are interested in doing administrative tasks, so would you please help us to de-orphan all Lonely pages from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:LonelyPages here]?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:44, 1 December 2014 (EST)
-Sure JoeyJ, I'd be happy to help. Any guidelines? I searched under Conservapedia:Orphan_pages but couldn't find anything. Should I base my work on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan_pages as generic advice? [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 14:58, 1 December 2014 (EST)
-:Thank you! Just take an article from [[Special:LonelyPages]] and link to it from another article. For example I did so with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Agriculture&action=historysubmit&diff=1119789&oldid=1112019 Biodynamic agriculture].--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 15:07, 1 December 2014 (EST)
-::Got it. Thanks for the quick response. Will do. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 15:10, 1 December 2014 (EST)
-:::You are doing a lot of needed work at Conservapedia. Keep up the good work! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:47, 1 December 2014 (EST)
-==Red Links==
-The proliferation of red wikilinks in your edits reminds me of the Walrus and the Carpenter:
-:''The walrus and the carpenter were walking close at hand,''
-:''They wept like anything to see such quantities of sand.''
-:''"If seven maids with seven brooms swept for half a year,''
-:''Do you suppose," the walrus said, "that they could get it clear?"''
-:''"I doubt it " said the carpenter, and wept a bitter tear.''
-:I have tended to sweep up after me the links I have generated in my 200odd thousand words of edits here. Who has the job of sweeping up the multiple links you are throwing around with gay (ahem) abandon? I think you should start sweeping, boyo, because, from bitter experience, I know no one else is going to do it. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 22:29, 10 December 2014 (EST)