Difference between revisions of "Talk:Plum Pudding Model"
There are no discussions on this page.
(move?) |
m (DavidB4 moved page Talk:Plum Pudding to Talk:Plum Pudding Model: moving to clarify this is a scientific theory, not a food) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Might I suggest moving this to something like [[Plum Pudding model]] or [[Plum Pudding (scientific theory)]]? As it is, this page title relates more to the food than the theory. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 13:37, 17 December 2016 (EST) | Might I suggest moving this to something like [[Plum Pudding model]] or [[Plum Pudding (scientific theory)]]? As it is, this page title relates more to the food than the theory. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 13:37, 17 December 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think that would be a good idea. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 14:46, 17 December 2016 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:42, February 3, 2017
Might I suggest moving this to something like Plum Pudding model or Plum Pudding (scientific theory)? As it is, this page title relates more to the food than the theory. --David B (TALK) 13:37, 17 December 2016 (EST)
- I think that would be a good idea. PeterIceHockey (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2016 (EST)