Conservapedia

Difference between revisions of "Talk:C (programming language)"

There are no discussions on this page.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
C does not have an "integrated inline assembler".  Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899.  Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. [[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 
C does not have an "integrated inline assembler".  Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899.  Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. [[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Why is this article protected? [[User:Coas|Coas]] 00:44, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:I unprotected it; the person who protected it is no longer active, and no reason had been given. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:36, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 15:32, December 1, 2009

C does not have an "integrated inline assembler". Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899. Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. Jtl 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Why is this article protected? Coas 00:44, 23 February 2008 (EST)

I unprotected it; the person who protected it is no longer active, and no reason had been given. DanH 01:36, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:C_(programming_language)&oldid=725524"
Return to "C (programming language)" page.