Difference between revisions of "Global Warming Policy Foundation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The '''Global Warming Policy Foundation''' (GWPF) is a think tank which seeks to give reliable information about climate change. It is based in London, England, and was f...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Global Warming Policy Foundation''' (GWPF) is a think tank which seeks to give reliable information about [[climate change]].  It is based in London, England, and was founded in 2009 by Lord Lawson and Dr Benny Peiser.<ref>https://www.thegwpf.org/who-we-are/</ref>
+
The '''Global Warming Policy Foundation''' (GWPF) is a [[think tank]] which seeks to give reliable information about [[climate change]].  It is based in [[London]], [[England]], and was founded in 2009 by [[Nigel Lawson|Lord Lawson]] and Dr Benny Peiser.<ref>https://www.thegwpf.org/who-we-are/</ref>
  
 
The GWPF has stated its principles as follows:
 
The GWPF has stated its principles as follows:
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
−
[[Category:Global Warming]]
+
[[Category:Conservative Organizations]]
 +
[[Category:Global Warming Skeptics]]
 
[[Category:Climate Change]]
 
[[Category:Climate Change]]

Latest revision as of 16:13, December 6, 2018

The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is a think tank which seeks to give reliable information about climate change. It is based in London, England, and was founded in 2009 by Lord Lawson and Dr Benny Peiser.[1]

The GWPF has stated its principles as follows:

  • The GWPF does not have an official or shared view about the science of global warming – although we are of course aware that this issue is not yet settled.
  • On climate science, our members and supporters cover a broad range of different views, from the IPCC position through agnosticism to outright scepticism.
  • Our main focus is to analyse global warming policies and their economic and other implications. Our aim is to provide the most robust and reliable economic analysis and advice.
  • We regard observational evidence and understanding the present as more important and more reliable than computer modelling or predicting the distant future.

References