Difference between revisions of "Infinity and Hebrews"

m
(Anselm made a compelling logical argument that Original Sin, which was infinite in its disobedience of God, required the Crucifixion and Resurrection as an infinite redemption of the sin.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*{{bibleref|Hebrews|11|12}} (translated as "innumerable" by [[ESV]])
 
*{{bibleref|Hebrews|11|12}} (translated as "innumerable" by [[ESV]])
 
*{{bibleref|Hebrews|12|22}} (translated as "innumerable" by [[ESV]])
 
*{{bibleref|Hebrews|12|22}} (translated as "innumerable" by [[ESV]])
−
 
+
*"forever and ever" (meaning for [[infinite]] time) - twice, at {{bibleref|Hebrews|1|8}} and {{bibleref|Hebrews|13|21}}
−
(add to list)
 
  
 
This Epistle also contains many references to "[[perfection]]", which is a concept similar to [[infinity]].
 
This Epistle also contains many references to "[[perfection]]", which is a concept similar to [[infinity]].
  
 +
[[Anselm]] made a compelling logical argument that [[Original Sin]], which was [[infinite]] in its disobedience of [[God]], required the [[Crucifixion]] and [[Resurrection]] as an infinite [[redemption]] of the sin.
 
[[category:Bible]]
 
[[category:Bible]]
 
[[category:Hebrews]]
 
[[category:Hebrews]]
 
[[category:infinity]]
 
[[category:infinity]]

Latest revision as of 01:34, May 31, 2025

Infinity and Hebrews are the multiple references to the concept of infinity in the Epistle to the Hebrews, more than 1500 years before infinity was accepted by mathematicians and philosophers. Greek thinkers viewed infinity with disdain.

Examples:

This Epistle also contains many references to "perfection", which is a concept similar to infinity.

Anselm made a compelling logical argument that Original Sin, which was infinite in its disobedience of God, required the Crucifixion and Resurrection as an infinite redemption of the sin.