Difference between revisions of "Talk:USS"
There are no discussions on this page.
(Part of the name?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of [[USS Arizona (BB-39)]]. While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of [[USS Arizona (BB-39)]]. While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-[[User:Tir|Tir]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *USS = ''United States Ship''. It is therefore part of the name, but prefix, nonetheless. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:20, 14 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:20, August 15, 2007
I was under the impression that USS was part of the ship name as given in the example of USS Arizona (BB-39). While not italicized, it is bold and is part of the name of the article and helps distinguish the HMS Vanguard from the USS Vanguard. --Rutm 21:42, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
I think it is both, anyway it won't hurt if one is seeking what the acronym USS is in the first place-Tir