Difference between revisions of "Contest3 Pre-Game Analysis"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by TK (Talk); changed back to last version by GregLarson)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
    <nowiki>
+
[[Contest3]]
    +-'~`---------------------------------/\--             
+
 
    ||"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" \\\\\\  \/~)          
+
----
    ||                                 \\\\\\ \/_         
+
 
    |~~~~~~~~-________________-_________________\ ~--_     
+
==Team2 (analysis by Team1):==
    !---------|_________      ------~~~~~(--   )--~~       
+
:Captain [[User:TK|TK]]
                        \ /~~~~\~~\  )--- \_ /(           
+
:* Like the basketball player Dennis Rodman, [[User:TK|TK]] can be very effective through his aggression and unpredictability.
                          ||     | | \  ()  \\           
+
:* Watch out if [[User:TK|TK]] blocks everyone on the other team!
                          \\____/_ / ()\        \\           
+
:* A good strategy by Team1 would be to provoke [[User:TK|TK]] into blocking the judges and disqualifying his team.
                          `~~~~~~~~~-. \        \\         
+
:[[User:Iduan|Iduan]]
                                      \ \ <($)> \\         
+
:* [[Contest3]] was his idea, so he is likely to score many points.
                    YOUR GOD IS DEAD    \ \        \\       
+
:*'''User rebuttal''' - actually i don't disagree with anything here, I just thought I'd join the crowd.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 20:41, 10 November 2007 (EST)
                    OPEN YOUR EYES      \ \        \\       
+
:[[User:DanH|DanH]]
                  RATIONALRESPONDERS.COM  \ \        \\     
+
:* Very experienced and consistent.  Reliable when needed.  Methodical like the chess champion he is.
                                          \ \  ()    \\     
+
:[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]
                                          _\_\__====~~~
+
:* Tremendous at eliminating "most wanted" pages, a great way to win points.
 +
:* His greatest strength is his years of experience at [[Wikipedia]]. But that can also be a weakness as bad habits are hard to change!
 +
:[[User:Mathers|Mathers]]
 +
:* A rookie at these contests, he could impress.
 +
:[[User:Crocoite/Contest3|Crocoite]]
 +
:* Master of the front page news items, and can be expected to run up many points that way.
 +
:[[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]]
 +
:* Consistent contributor since July 25, could be good when needed, provided that he can keep himself from arguing with liberals.
 +
:[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]]
 +
:* Was the captain of the winning team in Contest1.  Superb leader.
 +
:* Master of the art masterpieces!
 +
:[[User:Learn_together|Learn_together]]
 +
:* The top scorer in Contest2.  Team2 was lucky to get him this time.
 +
:[[User:BrianCo|Brian]]
 +
:* Back off the injured reserve from his motorcycle accident.  Only question mark is whether he is 100% yet.
 +
 
 +
==Team 1 (analysis by Team 2):==
 +
:Captain [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]
 +
:*Hmm, I haven't really heard of this user ... must be a new guy (lol)
 +
:*Scored the most points within his team in the last contest - and given his record is likely to score a lot again. Tip: Easily distracted. ;-)
 +
:*'''User rebuttal:''' I'm going to break the individual contest record of 1473 points set by [[User:Learn_together]] last time!
 +
:[[User:Dewey|Dewey]]
 +
:*A relatively new editor that has done a lot in the first month - likely to keep it up.
 +
:[[User:SharonS|SharonS]]
 +
:*She was on Aschlafly's last team - and scored 1088 points. Extremely consistent - scoring a large number of points each day.
 +
:[[User:GregLarson|Greg]]
 +
:*Major editor who has had over 1200 edits in the past two months. Likely to give an extra push given that it's the contest - and therefore could be one of if not the top contributor.
 +
:[[User:BethanyS|BethanyS]]
 +
:*Another consistent editor likely to increase her contribs for the contest.
 +
:[[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]]
 +
:*A relatively new editor who has started off quick.
 +
:[[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB]]
 +
:*Scored 749 points in the last contest - definitely a steal by Team 1
 +
:[[User:TheGuy|TheGuy]]
 +
:*With his time from EQ - has been around for a while. Experience will obviously work in his favor.
 +
:[[User:MexMax|MexMax]]
 +
:*A wild card - MexMax seems to be the newest editor on a team - and he could go both ways. His inexperience might hurt him - but at the same time given that he is a new member he's obviously eager to impress. Watch out for this guy.
 +
:*'''User rebuttal:''' you better watch out! I'm called the fastest... errr... poster (?) in the West!-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]]
 +
:[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]]
 +
:*Strong off the bench, as he was in the last contest with lots of points in the last few days.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Conservapedia]]

Latest revision as of 03:53, November 15, 2007

Contest3


Team2 (analysis by Team1):

Captain TK
  • Like the basketball player Dennis Rodman, TK can be very effective through his aggression and unpredictability.
  • Watch out if TK blocks everyone on the other team!
  • A good strategy by Team1 would be to provoke TK into blocking the judges and disqualifying his team.
Iduan
  • Contest3 was his idea, so he is likely to score many points.
  • User rebuttal - actually i don't disagree with anything here, I just thought I'd join the crowd.--IDuan 20:41, 10 November 2007 (EST)
DanH
  • Very experienced and consistent. Reliable when needed. Methodical like the chess champion he is.
Ed Poor
  • Tremendous at eliminating "most wanted" pages, a great way to win points.
  • His greatest strength is his years of experience at Wikipedia. But that can also be a weakness as bad habits are hard to change!
Mathers
  • A rookie at these contests, he could impress.
Crocoite
  • Master of the front page news items, and can be expected to run up many points that way.
SSchultz
  • Consistent contributor since July 25, could be good when needed, provided that he can keep himself from arguing with liberals.
Joaquín Martínez
  • Was the captain of the winning team in Contest1. Superb leader.
  • Master of the art masterpieces!
Learn_together
  • The top scorer in Contest2. Team2 was lucky to get him this time.
Brian
  • Back off the injured reserve from his motorcycle accident. Only question mark is whether he is 100% yet.

Team 1 (analysis by Team 2):

Captain Aschlafly
  • Hmm, I haven't really heard of this user ... must be a new guy (lol)
  • Scored the most points within his team in the last contest - and given his record is likely to score a lot again. Tip: Easily distracted. ;-)
  • User rebuttal: I'm going to break the individual contest record of 1473 points set by User:Learn_together last time!
Dewey
  • A relatively new editor that has done a lot in the first month - likely to keep it up.
SharonS
  • She was on Aschlafly's last team - and scored 1088 points. Extremely consistent - scoring a large number of points each day.
Greg
  • Major editor who has had over 1200 edits in the past two months. Likely to give an extra push given that it's the contest - and therefore could be one of if not the top contributor.
BethanyS
  • Another consistent editor likely to increase her contribs for the contest.
Lukecorlando
  • A relatively new editor who has started off quick.
DeborahB
  • Scored 749 points in the last contest - definitely a steal by Team 1
TheGuy
  • With his time from EQ - has been around for a while. Experience will obviously work in his favor.
MexMax
  • A wild card - MexMax seems to be the newest editor on a team - and he could go both ways. His inexperience might hurt him - but at the same time given that he is a new member he's obviously eager to impress. Watch out for this guy.
  • User rebuttal: you better watch out! I'm called the fastest... errr... poster (?) in the West!-MexMax
Double Edge
  • Strong off the bench, as he was in the last contest with lots of points in the last few days.