Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rick Roll"
From Conservapedia
(New page: What? ~~~~) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:58, 16 January 2008 (EST) | What? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:58, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :Care to elaborate? [[User:Kirk J|Kirk J]] 17:06, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::How is singing the song ''Yellow'' a liberally decietful way to spread the homosexual agenda? | ||
| + | ::Additionally, I looked up "Rick Rolling" and according to [http://www.yougotrickrolled.com/ YouGotRickRolled.com] and [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rick+rolled Urban Dictionary] the act is linking someone to a ''Rick Astley'' video, not just any video (and not not ''Yellow''). This video, too, is not trying to spread the homosexual agenda. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] | ||
| + | :::I probably didn't clarify this properly in the article: it's deceitful because the victim is convinced that the link is something other than the video. In my case I was told that it was a news article about Ron Paul, when it clearly wasn't. I only discovered this when I clicked the link, to which the perpetrator claimed I had been "Rick Rolled." Also, it seems fairly obvious to me that this man is a homosexual. Yellow is one of the colors of the rainbow afterall, which has been misappropriated by the homosexual agenda as a symbol for gay pride. As for it being the wrong video, I wouldn't know. This was the video I was linked to by a friend when they "Rick Rolled" me. [[User:Kirk J|Kirk J]] 17:49, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::::Well I'm not sure personal opinion is good enough for an encyclopedia. Going from the color yellow to "pushing the gay agenda" is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:31, 16 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Grr. I fell for one of these. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:31, 5 March 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :::me too - yesterday, in fact. So seeing this pop up here now, really twists the knife :) [[User:JessicaT|JessicaT]] 12:17, 3 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | Okay, so I'm probably the Rick Roll magnet, based on how many times I've fallen for it. But still, does this need its own article? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 01:20, 7 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Probably not, but it's already here. Better students find out about Rick Rolling here, than on less savory sites. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:39, 7 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:39, October 7, 2008
What? HelpJazz 16:58, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Care to elaborate? Kirk J 17:06, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- How is singing the song Yellow a liberally decietful way to spread the homosexual agenda?
- Additionally, I looked up "Rick Rolling" and according to YouGotRickRolled.com and Urban Dictionary the act is linking someone to a Rick Astley video, not just any video (and not not Yellow). This video, too, is not trying to spread the homosexual agenda. HelpJazz
- I probably didn't clarify this properly in the article: it's deceitful because the victim is convinced that the link is something other than the video. In my case I was told that it was a news article about Ron Paul, when it clearly wasn't. I only discovered this when I clicked the link, to which the perpetrator claimed I had been "Rick Rolled." Also, it seems fairly obvious to me that this man is a homosexual. Yellow is one of the colors of the rainbow afterall, which has been misappropriated by the homosexual agenda as a symbol for gay pride. As for it being the wrong video, I wouldn't know. This was the video I was linked to by a friend when they "Rick Rolled" me. Kirk J 17:49, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Grr. I fell for one of these. DanH 00:31, 5 March 2008 (EST)
- me too - yesterday, in fact. So seeing this pop up here now, really twists the knife :) JessicaT 12:17, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Okay, so I'm probably the Rick Roll magnet, based on how many times I've fallen for it. But still, does this need its own article? -Foxtrot 01:20, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
