|
|
| (255 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |style="background:white; border: 2px solid maroon; font-weight:bold; font-variant:small-caps"|<div class="horizontal"> | | |style="background:white; border: 2px solid maroon; font-weight:bold; font-variant:small-caps"|<div class="horizontal"> |
| | + | *2007 |
| | *[[/Archive1|(August)]] | | *[[/Archive1|(August)]] |
| | *[[/Archive2|(September)]] | | *[[/Archive2|(September)]] |
| Line 8: |
Line 9: |
| | *[[/Archive4|(November)]] | | *[[/Archive4|(November)]] |
| | *[[/Archive5|(December)]]<br/> | | *[[/Archive5|(December)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2008 |
| | *[[/Archive6|(January)]] | | *[[/Archive6|(January)]] |
| | *[[/Archive7|(February)]] | | *[[/Archive7|(February)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive8|(August)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2009 |
| | + | *[[/Archive9|(January)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive10|(February)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive11|(March)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive12|(April)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2010 |
| | + | *[[/Archive13|(January)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive14|(June)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive15|(July)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2011 |
| | + | *[[/Archive16|(March)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive17|(April)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive18|(May)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive19|(June)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive20|(July)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive21|(August)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive22|(November)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2012 |
| | + | *[[/Archive23|(November)]]<br/> |
| | + | *2013 |
| | + | *[[/Archive24|(July)]] |
| | + | *[[/Archive25|(Decemeber)]] |
| | </div> | | </div> |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | ==NFL Templates== | + | == Thoughts on clarifying some username policies. == |
| − | Thanks for making those NFL Templates. I noticed some of them weren't being used in the articles, so I inserted them. I hope you continue making those templates. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 16:29, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :Ahh, thank you, yeah there was a question of what namespace they should go in for a while - but I think it's pretty much been resolved that the template namespace is adequate; and I certainly do plan on continuing soon! Thanks for putting them in consistently (I like the fact that you put it in its own section - that makes it a lot more clear and it also makes the pages nicer)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 16:31, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :: Those templates were originally in template namespace, and I suggested (months ago) that they shouldn't be. My reasons were as follows:
| |
| − | ::* If they are only used on one page, there's little point in making templates for them.
| |
| − | ::* Current policy is for templates to be locked, so if the roster changes (as I expect would happen reasonably often) then a sysop needs to change (or at least unlock) them.
| |
| − | ::* If you don't want complex tables cluttering up the article, then they could be put into a sub-page and linked into the article as a template.
| |
| − | :: Now, if something has changed, such as them now being used on multiple pages, then that changes things, but otherwise I think they should not be in template namespace. I've not seen any other discussion on this, so if there is one somewhere, and particularly if it mentions factors that I haven't considered, could you point me to it please? I'm not laying this down as law, but I think it's pertinent to consider.
| |
| − | :: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:58, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :::The only reason I said I thought they should be in the template namespace is because when I started transferring them to the mainspace others started telling me to stop ... I mean frankly I'm fine with you moving them, I'll even go back and fix all the links - because I actually believe that they should be in the mainspace (since they're only being used on one page) - but ultimately it's your call - just give me the heads up whatever you decide and I'll go in and change the links.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 10:20, 9 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Guard dog ==
| + | Please check your email so I can ask some questions about these.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:16, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
| | | | |
| − | What's the deal with that? --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 17:27, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| + | Also, I don't know why this posted three times.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:18, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
| − | :From what I've heard, and I'm not going to give away everything because I don't know what's final and what's not, it's an experimental program meant to more easily block vandals without the presence of admins - I was mistakenly blocked by it; but luckily Philip was there to explain.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:30, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| + | :I deleted the extra sections. Responded to your email - feel free to ask any questions. Just so everyone knows what I sent/to clarify: Username policy is that you use your first name and last initial; you might see a few users who don't fit under that policy (Conservative, Karajou - even I use the opposite (although your first initial last name would also be okay)), but that is because those users predate the policy.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:11, 19 February 2014 (EST) |
| − | | |
| − | ::Sweet! That will be awesome...except then we don't get to block them ourselves. :/ [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 17:34, 8 February 2008 (EST) | |
| − | :::: It won't pick up all types of vandalism, so there will still be plenty of opportunities for you to block editors! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:07, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :Ah...Okay...still it's really awesome(genius). :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 18:16, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :::Haha - it does sound pretty awesome - Philip = amazingness--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:36, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | Very true![[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 17:37, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :Wow, sounds like a very useful system. --[[User:Liam Spencer|'''<span style="background:#7BA05B;color:turquoise"> L.S. </span>''']] 17:44, 8 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Looks pretty lame to me, but that may have just been the beta… --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 10:30, 9 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : Sorry about that latest block. Rather than it needing a bit more fine tuning, in this case it appears to be a bug. I've turned it right off for now, until I can find and fix the bug. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 16:59, 9 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == [[Template:USState]] ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Congratulations. Looks good.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 17:28, 9 February 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :Thanks - I'm actually kind of nervous about the looks ... but I appreciate your support (oh and by the way - good thinking to use switch!)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:31, 9 February 2008 (EST)
| |