Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Liberal code words"
(let's be rational about this) |
m (Talk:Liberal code word moved to Talk:Essay:Liberal code words) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. [[Rationalism]] seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | :You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. [[Rationalism]] seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Have a list? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Conservative code words == | ||
| + | |||
| + | All right a bit of a parthian shot: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here are some code words conservatives use:[[Liberal deceit]], [[Liberal bias]] etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Don't run away. Stay, and help me write [[Political terminology]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::not going anywhere just going to bed [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 12:31, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == sourcing == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I did a quick [http://books.google.com/books?um=1&q=%22liberal+code+words%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp google books search] and a [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&q=%22liberal+code+words%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps google scholar search], and the reasults were not too pleasing. It appears this is not a scholarly article, and as such should be moved from the encyclopedia to the essay namespace. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:06, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Why == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why why why? There's no sources, there's no attribution! I make the plea yet again to move this to the essay space. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, I have something to say so everybody listen: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <big><big><font color=red>'''You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia!''' </font> </big></big> [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:40, January 3, 2009
And this is another example of the 'Liberal _____' articles. This one entirely inspired by a comment I left on HelpJazz's page. You don't do your website any favours by producing ridiculous articles like this all the time. Wearethefuture 11:24, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. Rationalism seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --Ed Poor Talk 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Have a list?
You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? ×.××¢×¨× ×¢×¨ 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Conservative code words
All right a bit of a parthian shot:
Here are some code words conservatives use:Liberal deceit, Liberal bias etc.
- Don't run away. Stay, and help me write Political terminology. --Ed Poor Talk 12:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- not going anywhere just going to bed ×.××¢×¨× ×¢×¨ 12:31, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
sourcing
I did a quick google books search and a google scholar search, and the reasults were not too pleasing. It appears this is not a scholarly article, and as such should be moved from the encyclopedia to the essay namespace. Bohdan 13:06, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Why
Why why why? There's no sources, there's no attribution! I make the plea yet again to move this to the essay space. HelpJazz 13:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) Bohdan 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion.
OK, I have something to say so everybody listen:
You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia! ×.××¢×¨× ×¢×¨ 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT)