Difference between revisions of "Talk:Final Fantasy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(start over?) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It might be possible to start over with a God-centered critique, similar to what we have done with [[Grand Theft Auto]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:41, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | :It might be possible to start over with a God-centered critique, similar to what we have done with [[Grand Theft Auto]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:41, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [http://christiananswers.net/spotlight/games/2001/finalfantasy9.html] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, I'm second to that, but we should add warning like:"this game might contain the word of magic or info of witchcraft". And thanks info about FF9, it brought good times. --[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 09:08, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "Created by vandal"... worst excuse ever. Deleted a factual page because other contributions were of the dirt? +_+ <sub>always tired</sub> [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :The page was not factual and it was created hundreds of times by numerous socks. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:47, 4 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:47, June 5, 2008
Why was this page deleted Eljawa 09:26, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
- It might be possible to start over with a God-centered critique, similar to what we have done with Grand Theft Auto. --Ed Poor Talk 08:41, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
- One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [1]
Yes, I'm second to that, but we should add warning like:"this game might contain the word of magic or info of witchcraft". And thanks info about FF9, it brought good times. --TagoPagdaluhong 09:08, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
"Created by vandal"... worst excuse ever. Deleted a factual page because other contributions were of the dirt? +_+ always tired Kektk 22:40, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- The page was not factual and it was created hundreds of times by numerous socks. HenryS 22:47, 4 June 2008 (EDT)