Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
proposed policy
Line 1: Line 1: −
Never imply that a sweeping condemnation of liberal evils is "wrong" or "exaggerated". In particular, do not follow an article intro with counterexamples which "disprove" its thesis. Rather, clarify the scope of the thesis and provide examples that prove its point first.
+
{{policy proposal}}Never imply that a sweeping condemnation of liberal evils is "wrong" or "exaggerated". In particular, do not follow an article intro with counterexamples which "disprove" its thesis. Rather, clarify the scope of the thesis and provide examples that prove its point first.
    
In cases where there is disagreement between conservatives and liberals about a point of values, morals, principles or facts:
 
In cases where there is disagreement between conservatives and liberals about a point of values, morals, principles or facts:
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu