Difference between revisions of "User talk:DeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Correct title)
m (Reverted edits by TK (talk) to last revision by DeanS)
 
(354 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Just tell me how could we protect better the Mormon articles? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 12:31, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
  
−
:What do you mean by "protect better" Joaquín? This is a wiki and we try to avoid protecting the articles. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:23, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
: OK, I will do my best to patroll them. At present I am out of home. Just keep doing your wonderfull work. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 13:31, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Joaquín, Thanks for Patrolling the articles and dealing with JimmyP. As I mentioned on the church talk page, he needs to explain in detail why he has a problem with that link. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:27, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:: I am out of town. I will be back untill August 6th. Thanks for your help. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 14:16, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::: Good to hear from you Joaquín. I hope you have a great vacation! --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 17:26, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
Hi DeanS, what a great article 'Breaking Speaker Pelosi's News Blackout'. I love the strategy, proud of my GOP 'ers, it is so patriotic!--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 00:50, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Thanks Jpatt! Now if only President Bush would make Congress come back in session to deal with this issue. They don't deserve a five-week vacation. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 02:11, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Thanks, Bro! ==
 
−
 
−
I thought your guys are gonna ignore me again, but Nah, I got wrong ideas. Thank you, May the Lord bless you! [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&oldid=497248] I wish I was brave enough to do that! But only I'm  could is to support them to do so, "sigh".--[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 11:36, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Your welcome Tago. I think the pic is a nice addition as well. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:39, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::I must say, that picture is much better view then the source had.--[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 11:50, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::I agree. I followed the pic to its source and was rewarded with this version. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:58, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Welcome==
 
−
 
−
Thanks for the welcome! This website is actually a god-send, a perfect oppurtunity to actually make use of my summer holidays. Hey by the way, I was wondering what CP's policy on science articles are, as this will probably be the aspect I'll be contributing to quite a lot. Thanks again- [[User:Jl2000|Jl2000]]
 
−
 
−
:Just start editing and you'll find out soon enough ;-) --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:21, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I researched this person's edits and found much of the material to be false.  There was also information on that other site which made it very clear that he was just another of their parodists. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:58, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Interesting. They're supposed to be on a boycott of CP right now. ;-) --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:29, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Christian solidarity==
 
−
 
−
Hi, Dean. I like your [[:Image:Beijing arrests.jpg]] but I couldn't edit the caption. Can you crop the image and put the caption in the image link? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:30, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Hi Ed. How about this cropped image? The caption is in the image info. [[:Image:Beijing arrests2.jpg]] --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:24, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Thanks and a request or two. ==
 
−
 
−
Thanks for pointing me at that list of admins. Two things - [[Conservapedia:User rights]] is full of broken links but is locked - can you or someone else fix these? Also can you unlock [[Rape]] for me as well - the current wording includes the phrase "seducing a child" - as seduction as a concept can suggest an element of consent I'd like to rephrase the article. Thanks in advance. [[User:DefenderofTrue|DefenderofTrue]] 21:39, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Pre-screening of News stories==
 
−
 
−
Just curious - why the "No article prescreening" policy, and why delete what I thought were constructive comments, instead of responding to them on the page? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 20:44, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:The reason there will be no article pre-screening by you (or other liberals) is because myself or another admin will be prescreening the articles.
 
−
 
−
:I deleted your comments because those project pages are only for project members, and I'm not going to have nonmembers influencing the project. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:58, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Okay, all that makes sense, but if you read my post, I wasn't suggesting that I pre-screen, because I know non-conservatives like me aren't welcome on the sub-project.  I had the sense that there was no pre-screening by anyone, and your edit-comment seemed to bear that out.  Thanks for clarifying.
 
−
 
−
::Also, can I ask a blunt but serious question?  Do you ever find that the labels of "liberal" and "conservative" are taken wayyy too seriously here, resulting in an all-or-none, black-and-white division between the two perspectives?  I never post here to make trouble, only to offer a viewpoint that's usually more nuanced than the black-hat/white-hat exchanges that often take place.  I hate labels myself, because in my case I'm libertarian on most social issues, conservative on fiscal ones, and still trying to figure out the spiritual - "Unitarian/Universalist" is probably closer than "Agnostic", but neither one is a strong enough fit to apply to myself. 
 
−
 
−
::So if you want to create sub-projects for the true-believers only, go for it.  I've just observed that while this is Conservapedia and not Neutralapedia, the "feel" of the place has become more polarized and combative, with less tolerance for dissent or even respectful disagreement, and a corresponding drop in the number and quality of contributors. 
 
−
 
−
::As I said though, good luck with the news project, and I'll post my comments on the Main:Talk page.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:17, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Dinsdale, You said, "I wasn't suggesting that I pre-screen". What is this? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Wikiproject:News&diff=prev&oldid=502069 "... I'd be glad to participate in article screening..."]
 
−
 
−
:::No, I don't find the labels are taken ''too'' seriously here. I have a problem with liberals and their way of thinking. Liberal viewpoints are wrong.
 
−
 
−
:::I find very little of the "respectful disagreement" from liberals; mostly I see great examples of [[Liberal Style]], vandalism, parody, troublemaking, obscenity, etc.
 
−
 
−
:::Your comments here are respectful; therefore I have responded in kind. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 21:39, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Thanks for the courteous response.  As for my statement on volunteering, the ''complete'' statement was "I'd be glad to participate in article screening <b>but I don't qualify to be on this sub-project.</b>"  Hey, I'd love night-editing rights, too, but I'm about as qualified to get that, too ;-) --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 22:05, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::LOL --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 22:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
==Didn't mean to step on toes==
 
−
I'm just a huge fan of Cherone's and his ability to not alienate people when discussing Christianity and why abortion is wrong.  So, I'd rather stick his "line in the sand" in there, if you don't mind.  He has stated that anyone who really wants to be taken seriously in this debate at least needs to recognize that a woman has a right to live, if / when a baby directly threatens that.  It's a position, being a woman wanting children, I happen to share.  :-)  If you really think it's liberal bias, let me know or a third party know, and we can "let the majority vote" (as it were).--[[User:MHayes|MHayes]] 22:43, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
: Btw, I DO mind. There is NO majority vote when an administrator removes liberal bias. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 22:59, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::I guess I don't understand what "liberal bias" is in this case, then.  Are you asserting that Cherone is a liberal?  I really have no idea his political preference, just what he has said about abortion.  --[[User:MHayes|MHayes]] 23:01, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::No, I'm not saying that Cherone is a liberal. See my comments at [[Talk:Extreme]] --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:16, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Wikinews==
 
−
DeanS, Wikinews, my spelling error on the Ayers story. Unrepentent should be unrepentant.-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 10:31, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
Could you add int link for Stephanie Tubbs Jones? Tanks in advance!--[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:43, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Thanks Jp. This mistake has been [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&curid=66589&diff=502572&oldid=502384 corrected].
 
−
 
−
:The wikilink was added [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&curid=66589&diff=502578&oldid=502572 here]. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 12:53, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Thank you!==
 
−
For stepping in. Whoever that person was, he was doing bad things to my blood pressure :) --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Hajimemashite!'']]</sup> 10:07, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:You're welcome Jessica. He was an imposter and was dealt with accordingly. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:10, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I got really annoyed... --[[User:DiEb|DiEb]] 10:32, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:No wonder you were annoyed. I'm sorry this happened to you. We have enemies of this site, and they don't care who gets hurt or how much damage/disruption they cause. This incident reminds me of homicide bombers. All they care about is themselves and how much damage they can cause.
 
−
 
−
:Be on the alert for imposters. You can check their contributions like [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JasonH this]. JasonH's contribs started today. Also JasonH created his account [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=JasonH today]. Since we know [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue the real Jinxmchue] has been editing for a while, that would also be a clue that JasonH was an imposter. Finally, he used this obvious deceitful <nowiki>[[User:JasonH|Jinxmchue]]</nowiki> [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DiEb&diff=prev&oldid=503259 signature.] --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:59, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Thank You for the Unblock==
 
−
 
−
I appreciate being restored given that my comments aren't mainstream here, and I appreciate the benefit of the doubt. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 19:52, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Phillip explained why I was wrong, and I wanted to fix my mistake. Even though I don't agree with your views, I won't block you for expressing them. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:58, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Wikinews Project ==
 
−
 
−
Mr. DeanS,
 
−
 
−
Why exactly do you think I'm a liberal? I've tried to make it clear that I am anything but.
 
−
 
−
--[[User:JosephG|JosephG]] 23:52, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Joseph, I don't think you're a liberal. I thought I explained the reason clearly in the email. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 00:36, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
I see you have had great success with wanted pages via Wikinews. Since you have run out of new topics, I thought to suggest adding some words from [[Special:Wantedpages]]. Just to keep the pac motivated.-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:43, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Jp, even though that is an interesting suggestion, I prefer to link to items on the news section; since this is a news project. If you want to suggest items, look at the news articles and see where the wikilinks are missing. Sometimes it's because the poster didn't bother to use existing wikilinks; other times it's because the article hasn't been created yet. It's quite challenging to go through the news articles and find these wikilinks. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:14, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:: No problem. Before I submit a news item, I wikilink almost every word then use the preview to see which is or isn't listed. If you like, I can immediately add words that don't appear to the wanted section. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 16:45, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::That would be great! If you could add missing wikilinks for the other suggestions, that would be even better. ;-) --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:51, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Jp, I have reconsidered your idea to use the Conservapedia wanted articles. Just using the news wikilinks was okay, but including the general wanted articles is even better. Plus these articles also add to their count. If you want to add articles, add them to the bottom of the [[Wikiproject:News/Wanted_page#Conservapedia_wanted_articles|Conservapedia wanted articles]] section. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:53, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:: Response to 'add missing wikilinks for the other suggestions', I would but do not have access to mainpage:right. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:25, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::What I mean is that you can add the missing wikilinks ''before'' the suggestion is posted.
 
−
:::Thanks for continuing to add new wanted articles.
 
−
:::What do you think about the section on revising the news postings? --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 12:32, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::I am fine with adding wikilinks before postings, even if they do not get posted.
 
−
::::My pleasure to help CP
 
−
::::Sounds interesting but I am not sure I understand. Do you mean, create a short essay/summary, then link back? -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:39, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::::Once you add the revised headline summary, I will replace my headline with your revised headline on the Main Page. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 12:46, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Outdated news item ==
 
−
 
−
The main page has a news item that says: "According to RealClearPolitics, for the first time in the 2008 Presidential race, John McCain overtakes Barack Obama in the Electoral College poll 274 to 264." You may want to remove that from the main page since it is no longer accurate, and the link provided leads to a page showing Obama leading McCain 273 to 265 (that is what is how right now, anyway). [[User:KimEide|KimEide]] 13:54, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Done. Thanks for the alert. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:22, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== IP's ban ==
 
−
 
−
(Not sure if this is proper procedure, but I'm still fairly new).
 
−
 
−
I disagree with your ban of Impm; there was no 'edit war' that could be perceived based on his recent (see five minutes ago) edits of the Barack Obama article. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:45, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Jirby, MYOB or ''you'' will be blocked. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:50, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Wow, they're really obsessed with me ==
 
−
 
−
How many people have created accounts referencing me?  Quite a few, it seems.  At least 3, to my recollection, including today's "Lowjinx." [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:02, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:They're obsessed alright; with you, all of the Conservapedia sysops and Conservapedia itself. They are also obsessed with vandalism, parody, deceit, and every other element of the [[Liberal Style]].
 
−
 
−
:I prefer to call them "possessed". They are possessed of a lying and evil spirit. They're sowing wickedness, and will reap wickedness at the judgment day.
 
−
--[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:01, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::A little less [[Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks|talk]], please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:28, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Good, steady work==
 
−
 
−
Dean, thank you for your longstanding, careful attention to the main page. No one keeps up with current events as well as you do.
 
−
 
−
I also like your "wiki gnome" work, like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Indian-American&curid=72030&diff=506590&oldid=506571 this minor copy edit]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:29, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:You're welcome Ed. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:53, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==False quotes in News story on Obama speech==
 
−
 
−
I wasn't sure if you saw my comments about the false statements in the headline about the Obama speech.  Do you consider the headline correct in it's current form?  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:24, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Yes, I read your comments. I would like Chippeterson to respond to you and provide a link for reference. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:59, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Understandable, but here's a [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/us/politics/28text-obama.html link] to the transcript of the speech, which clearly shows the headline is false and misleading.  Chippeterson should respond, but only a sysop has the ability to edit news postings on the main page, and as the link shows, it's wrong.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:10, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Bear in mind that ''The New York Times'' is the leading liberal news source, so their "factual" claims must often be given close scrutiny. They have even misreported science news, e.g., publishing the assertion about open water at the North Pole (which was later shown to be historically inaccurate) just in time to influence public policy on [[global warming]].
 
−
 
−
:::Although liberals refer to the NY Times as the "newspaper of record", conservatives don't give it as much credence. (They have the legal write to print opinion as fact, you know; see [[First Amendment]].) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:36, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
:It's not '''"the"''' transcript (as in the only one possible); you left out "as recorded by CQ Transcriptions". Part of the strategy of liberal news media is to pick their sources carefully to give the impression they want. If you do a little research, you can find where a Boston Globe editor declared this quite openly. Would you like that as a [[writing assignment]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:40, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Republican Convention Headline ==
 
−
 
−
Last phrase should read "Democratic Vice Presidential nominee", not "Democrat Vice Presidential nominee."  Thanks --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 12:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Fixed. Thanks for the correction. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:21, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== RIP Bill Melendez ==
 
−
 
−
Thanks for that news, sad as it is.  An unsung hero and icon of American culture whose legacy will live forever in our hearts.  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:24, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Thanks Jinx. The article was submitted by Benp and I just posted it. Can you start an article for [[Bill Melendez]]? --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 00:29, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::I'll have to see how soon I can get to it.  Going to bed now.  Have some yard work to do in the morning and work work from the afternoon through tomorrow morning. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 01:21, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::No problem Jinx. Thanks for your contributions. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:31, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Sysop Q==
 
−
How does one become a sysop? I've only been here a few days. [[User:JY23|JY23]]
 
−
 
−
:See [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Administrators Conservapedia:Administrators/Promotion]. Sysops are selected as needed from the best of the best contributors, there is no popularity contest to determine promotion. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 18:17, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Re: New article request process ==
 
−
 
−
Didn't know about the process ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikiproject%3ANews%2FWanted_page&diff=511110&oldid=511109])  Sorry, [[User:Nerd|Nerd]] 16:19, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:That's fine. I usually just do it myself, and after you tried to do it, I realized I needed to write a process. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:32, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Cool.  [[User:Nerd|Nerd]] 16:37, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Pictures==
 
−
DeanS, could you upload these photo's for me for the [[John McCain]] and [[Joe Biden]] articles, thanks.
 
−
 
−
http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/89ddfcef-3a43-49a6-99c4-b7f41986b56c_mn.jpeg
 
−
 
−
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/john-mccain-4.jpg [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] 8 September 2008
 
−
 
−
:Here you go: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Biden_on_Meet_the_Press.jpg Biden on Meet the Press] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:McCain_on_Meet_the_Press.jpg McCain on Meet the Press]. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:32, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I appreciate it. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]]9 September 2008
 
−
===Other Pictures===
 
−
Also DeanS, there are some articles with no pictures at all and could really use them. I was hoping you could upload these.
 
−
 
−
http://www.moderate-america.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/colin_powell-277x300.jpg
 
−
 
−
http://www.gcva.us/dpts/vote/TimKainePic.jpg
 
−
 
−
http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/pix/ray_nagin_cp_8482804.jpg
 
−
 
−
http://www.fantasycongress.com/public/img/senators/graham_lindsey_SC.jpg [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] 9 September 2008
 
−
 
−
:Here you go: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Colin_Powell.jpg Colin Powell], [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:TimKaine.jpg Tim Kaine], [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Ray_Nagin.jpg Ray Nagin] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Lindsey_Graham.jpg Lindsey Graham]. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 02:52, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Chippeterson, I deleted the Ray Nagin photo from Conservapedia and reverted the article because it could have been an AP photo and we're not allowed to use AP photos. The cbc.ca site uses a lot of AP photos and I wasn't able to determine if this was an AP photo. I don't mind uploading pics for you, I just need you to double-check the source and ensure they're non-AP photos before I can upload in the future. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 13:42, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I'll be more careful from now on DeanS. How about this one of Nagin from answers.com. http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en-commons/thumb/7/74/225px-Nagin2June2006.jpg [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] 10 September 2008
 
−
 
−
:Chippeterson, thanks for understanding. Here's the pic for [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Ray_Nagin2.jpg Ray Nagin]. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 18:28, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Betty Ford==
 
−
I just wrote an article on [[Betty Ford]] and it could use her picture. Could you upload this. Thanks. http://z.about.com/d/womenshistory/1/7/q/A/betty_ford.jpg
 
−
 
−
:Here you go: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Betty_Ford.JPG Betty Ford]. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 22:07, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
 
−
==Night Edits==
 
−
DeanS, i think somebody left the spicket on. Can you close new user signup til daylight hours? Thanks -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 01:16, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I noticed that too and already took care of it. Thanks for the reminder. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:25, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::Yesterday it was turned off around 2. I thought it was just later now than it used to be. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 01:33, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::It varies. I'm not going to go into details, but you can email Andy if you have further questions. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:36, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::::Naw, I understand. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 01:37, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== "Debate about news articles is not allowed on this project." ==
 
−
 
−
This makes absolutely no sense. Somebody suggests a news item on [[Wikiproject:News/Suggestions]], but comments about these ''suggestions'' have to be posted on [[Talk:Main Page]] ''before the suggestions are posted on the main page''? Talk about convoluted! Nobody would know what I'm objecting against, so I would have to preface it with "Somebody suggested a news item on this and that page, and I'll now comment on it here". But I can see that my objection had zero impact either way, so posting it again in the "proper" place won't do a thing, will it? McCain is excused for not knowing how to send a mail because he can't use a keyboard (sorta kinda). Right. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 16:28, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:DirkB, although it doesn't make sense to you, there is a reason for this rule. I want that page to contain suggestions only. I don't want liberals debating about the suggestions. From what I've seen on the Talk:Main Page, liberals like to discuss some of the articles, other editors reply, and this goes back and forth. I don't care whether you or other liberals agree with the suggested article. You can have these endless discussions on the Talk:Main Page after it's posted, not on the suggestions page. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:45, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::I don't think he liked your reply... [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:52, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:::Too bad. I'm not here to please the liberals.
 
−
:::Good block, btw. You better get ready to defend the permablock from Philip, etc. ;-) --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:57, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::::<sigh> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:59, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== {{User|DRamon}} ==
 
−
 
−
Do you think he should be unblocked?  Perhaps I was a little harsh, seeing as he has been creating content.  I took a look at his edits after he edited another user's userpage, though the user has now reverted back to Ramon's version.  Earlier this issue was brought up in Schlafly's talkpage.  I mainly blocked him for this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&diff=prev&oldid=517564].  The parodists have been having fun with that list.  Also he had been warned before. Take a look at his edits, is he a parodist? Do you think unblock? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 01:37, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:I do think DRamon should be unblocked and I don't see him as a parodist. If you want to warn him for editing someones user page that would be appropriate. Thanks for asking. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:46, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::User is unblocked. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 01:54, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::Thanks Henry. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 02:04, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Inappropriate user name ==
 
−
A new user has joined with the user name : Tony Blair. could you please look into it?--[[User:Carolyn|Carolyn]] 09:05, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:He's a vandal and has already been blocked. Thanks for the alert. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:07, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== Satan... Carrot Top... ==
 
−
 
−
You have to at least admit that was pretty funny.  It's rare that the vandals and parodists are actually funny instead of stupid. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:09, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:That's why I changed the block comment. ;-) --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:27, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Wiki support==
 
−
DeanS, as a member of Wikiproject: News, I feel you have spoiled me with attentiveness and clear direction. As a member of Wikiproject: Religion, I have no such contact, no direction, no replies. It is frustrating but I can live with that. I wanted to pick your brains about site structure that I have unable to find in the help section. Category's seem to have boundaries. A rule of thumb, no more than three, correct? Multiple category's on similar topics not looked upon as correct? e.g. Catholic Church and Christianity. Sub-categories have more precedent than category tagging? -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:33, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Thanks for the compliment, Jp. I don't have the same passion for categories and I defer an answer to those who have more interest. I would suggest you start a Wikiproject:Categories and go from there. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:58, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
==Fred1776==
 
−
 
−
Was it really necessary to revert that last edit by Fred1776?  It was on a talk page, and was not rude in anyway.  Robust, certainly, but neither rude nor insulting.  "Liberalist version whatever"'s edits were vandalism: this was an opinion.  It's one I happen to share and I am sure that many on this site share.  Surely Aschlafly is not such a tender soul that he needs protecting from this.  It might make unpleasant reading, but it's surely nicer and more decently put than a "mild" rebuke from Bugler  --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 16:55, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 18:39, June 20, 2017

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DeanS&oldid=1355295"