Difference between revisions of "User talk:Alexjohnc3"
From Conservapedia
Alexjohnc3 (Talk | contribs) m |
JLauttamus (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{welcome}} | {{welcome}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]== | ||
| + | Can you show me an example of conservative communism? Libertarian communism? If not, then please undo our edit. It's redundant. John McCain's campaign email should have no impact on a George Orwell novel. [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:54, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :When I say "liberal communism", I'm not saying that there's "conservative communism" or "libertarian communism" as well. "Liberal" can be used for emphasis like Rick Davis did [http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/25/camp-mccain-takes-on-angry-liberal-left/ here]. I was using that as an example where "liberal" was added to something that was already obviously referring to something leftist for emphasis. [[User:Alexjohnc3|Alexjohnc3]] 19:59, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::And that, my friend, is the definition of redundancy. I understand what you're trying to do, but in the context of the article I just don't see why the emphasis is needed. It's overly superfluous (see the redundancy?). [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 20:09, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:09, September 22, 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Alexjohnc3, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Alexjohnc3!
Nineteen Eighty-Four
Can you show me an example of conservative communism? Libertarian communism? If not, then please undo our edit. It's redundant. John McCain's campaign email should have no impact on a George Orwell novel. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:54, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
- When I say "liberal communism", I'm not saying that there's "conservative communism" or "libertarian communism" as well. "Liberal" can be used for emphasis like Rick Davis did here. I was using that as an example where "liberal" was added to something that was already obviously referring to something leftist for emphasis. Alexjohnc3 19:59, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
- And that, my friend, is the definition of redundancy. I understand what you're trying to do, but in the context of the article I just don't see why the emphasis is needed. It's overly superfluous (see the redundancy?). Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:09, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
