Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open source (software)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. --~~~~) |
m (RobSmith moved page Talk:Open source to Talk:Open source (software)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. | I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. | ||
--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == OSI == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force. | ||
| + | :OSI > GNU, lolz [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:35, May 21, 2022
I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. --Jack 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. Tmtoulouse 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
OSI
I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.
- OSI > GNU, lolz Jaques 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)