Difference between revisions of "Unintended consequences"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: *The Federal Reserve system had been established to prevent what actually happened. It was set up to avoid a situation in which you would have to close down banks, in which you would have ...)
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
*The Federal Reserve system had been established to prevent what actually happened. It was set up to avoid a situation in which you would have to close down banks, in which you would have a banking crisis. And yet, under the Federal Reserve system, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States. There's no other example I can think of, of a government measure which produced so clearly the opposite of the results that were intended. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/int_miltonfriedman.html#10]
+
'''Unintended consequences''' are unforeseen and/or unplanned results of an intent or plan. In most cases, the term is used when referring to negative consequences.
 +
 
 +
==The Great Depression==
 +
*The [[Federal Reserve]] system had been established to prevent what actually happened. It was set up to avoid a situation in which you would have to close down banks, in which you would have a banking crisis. And yet, under the Federal Reserve system, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States. There's no other example I can think of, of a government measure which produced so clearly the opposite of the results that were intended.<ref>https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/int_miltonfriedman.html#5</ref>
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Terms]]

Latest revision as of 18:01, August 27, 2021

Unintended consequences are unforeseen and/or unplanned results of an intent or plan. In most cases, the term is used when referring to negative consequences.

The Great Depression

  • The Federal Reserve system had been established to prevent what actually happened. It was set up to avoid a situation in which you would have to close down banks, in which you would have a banking crisis. And yet, under the Federal Reserve system, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States. There's no other example I can think of, of a government measure which produced so clearly the opposite of the results that were intended.[1]

References