Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open source (software)"

Latest revision as of 03:35, May 21, 2022

I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. --Jack 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. Tmtoulouse 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.

OSI > GNU, lolz Jaques 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:15, March 30, 2007 (view source) Tim.thelion (talk \| contribs) (OSI) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 03:35, May 21, 2022 (view source) RobSmith (talk \| contribs) m (RobSmith moved page Talk:Open source to Talk:Open source (software))
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.		I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.
		+	:OSI > GNU, lolz [[User:Jaques\|Jaques]] 23:45, 30 March 2007 (EDT)