Difference between revisions of "User talk:Iduan"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
m (archive)
 
(154 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
*2010
 
*2010
 
*[[/Archive13|(January)]]
 
*[[/Archive13|(January)]]
 +
*[[/Archive14|(June)]]
 +
*[[/Archive15|(July)]]<br/>
 +
*2011
 +
*[[/Archive16|(March)]]
 +
*[[/Archive17|(April)]]
 +
*[[/Archive18|(May)]]
 +
*[[/Archive19|(June)]]
 +
*[[/Archive20|(July)]]
 +
*[[/Archive21|(August)]]
 +
*[[/Archive22|(November)]]<br/>
 +
*2012
 +
*[[/Archive23|(November)]]<br/>
 +
*2013
 +
*[[/Archive24|(July)]]
 +
*[[/Archive25|(Decemeber)]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
|}
 
|}
  
−
==Conservapedia's message==
+
== Thoughts on clarifying some username policies. ==
−
I both understand and appreciate Conservapedia's efforts to create an encyclopedia from a conservative perspective, but doesn't mocking liberal publications for doing the same greatly undermine those principles? [[User:Acwellman|Acwellman]] 09:54, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
 
  
−
:(original message:The sarcastic tone of your edit to the Sarah Palin article [[liberal deceit|wasn't acceptable]]; you "praised" Palin in the article, but linked to a liberal website ridiculing her for the point (a site which you acknowledged was liberal [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Huffington_Post&oldid=785188 here]). Constructive edits are welcome here, but be mindful of what constructive means. We are constructing an encyclopedia from the conservative perspective. (Also, on a lighter note: please always review your edit after you've made it - you left out a <nowiki>start <ref></nowiki> tag)--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 12:23, 5 June 2010 (EDT))
+
Please check your email so I can ask some questions about these.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:16, 19 February 2014 (EST)
−
:: We point out the flaws in the liberal perspective that those publications endorse. And that still doesn't explain you using a source criticizing Palin while praising Palin in the article.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 11:29, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
 
  
−
By no means did I ever acknowledge any political leanings that the Huffington Post might have had. Rather, I used Conservapedia's own opinion set forth in the website's article about the Huffington Post [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Huffington_Post&oldid=785188 here], not my own personal beliefs about the website. In fact, I don't believe I even used the word "liberal" or anything connoting it in the above link. That one's on you.
+
Also, I don't know why this posted three times.--[[User:ChrisB00|ChrisB00]] 17:18, 19 February 2014 (EST)
−
 
+
:I deleted the extra sections. Responded to your email - feel free to ask any questions. Just so everyone knows what I sent/to clarify:  Username policy is that you use your first name and last initial; you might see a few users who don't fit under that policy (Conservative, Karajou - even I use the opposite (although your first initial last name would also be okay)), but that is because those users predate the policy.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:11, 19 February 2014 (EST)
−
Secondly, Palin doesn't deserve to be praised for much. I'm a fan of the old guard conservatives--Ronald Reagan, the Buckleys, the Goldwaters, Bush, Sr.. If the Conservative party is going to band together behind the likes of Palin, I'm not sure it's a party I want to adhere to anymore. And while the rebut may be that Conservapedia stands behind her, Conservapedians as a whole represent a mere fraction of the conservative intellectual population.
 
−
 
 
−
And in all honesty, I am appreciating the intellectual sparring match we are having.
 
−
 
 
−
I would like to amend the statement above about Palin not being deserved to be praised much. That was meant to address her faculties as a politician. I am impressed with the way she has handled the ups and downs in her own personal life. {{unsigned|Acwellman}} -- 09:10, 6 June 2010
 
−
 
 
−
:Wikilawyer somewhere else, Acwellman. Is this the kind of "debate" Green Farms is teaching these days? You are no more conservative than John Kerry. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:44, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::Huffington Post is obviously a liberal source, even Wikipedia acknowledges it as so. I'm glad you've enjoyed the back-and-forth, but unfortunately debate isn't the reason I started the conversation. I started the conversation because you made a deceitful edit - using a source criticizing Palin while praising her in the text that you wrote, and that's not acceptable, and I think you know that. You have to be constructive here.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 13:08, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 16:38, February 20, 2014




M
Welcome to my talk page!
Please feel free to ask a question I'll be happy to respond as soon as possible
leave a comment
Some things to keep in mind:

  • Please sign your name using ~~~~
  • I'll typically respond on my talk page unless otherwise requested
  • I archive whenever a convo is done


T

A

Y

L

K


Thoughts on clarifying some username policies.

Please check your email so I can ask some questions about these.--ChrisB00 17:16, 19 February 2014 (EST)

Also, I don't know why this posted three times.--ChrisB00 17:18, 19 February 2014 (EST)

I deleted the extra sections. Responded to your email - feel free to ask any questions. Just so everyone knows what I sent/to clarify: Username policy is that you use your first name and last initial; you might see a few users who don't fit under that policy (Conservative, Karajou - even I use the opposite (although your first initial last name would also be okay)), but that is because those users predate the policy.--IDuan 18:11, 19 February 2014 (EST)