Difference between revisions of "Genetic fallacy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Genetic fallacy''' is an faulty argument based on the circumstances of something's origin.  For example, arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by the pagans.
+
The '''genetic fallacy''' is a [[logical fallacy]] wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something.<ref>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Fallacy Files: Genetic Fallacy]</ref>  The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance.  An example is arguing that [[Christian]]s should not decorate [[Christmas tree]]s because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by [[pagans]].
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[Guilt by Association]]
 +
*[[Reductio ad Hitlerum]]
  
−
{{stub}}
+
== External links ==
−
[[Category: Logic]]
+
 
 +
*[https://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Genetic fallacy], Fallacy Files website
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Latest revision as of 20:59, June 19, 2023

The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something.[1] The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance. An example is arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by pagans.

See also

External links

References