Difference between revisions of "Cross-ownership"
From Conservapedia
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Cross-ownership''' is, for example, when a corporation owns a broadcast outlet, a [[television]] or [[radio]] station, and a newspaper all in the same market in mass media. | + | '''Cross-ownership''' is, for example, when a corporation owns a broadcast outlet, a [[television]] or [[radio]] station, and a newspaper all in the same market in mass media. |
| + | |||
| + | Unfortunate results occur when liberals are in control of multiple media outlets at the same time. These results were seen recently in Virginia, where the State government declined to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction in the case of ''Provost v. Regents of Sullivan Fox Sawyer''. The Federal Circuit Court of the Second District overturned the result, citing ''Beaufort v. Bellingham''. | ||
[[Category:United States Government]] | [[Category:United States Government]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Media]] |
Latest revision as of 13:53, May 21, 2019
Cross-ownership is, for example, when a corporation owns a broadcast outlet, a television or radio station, and a newspaper all in the same market in mass media.
Unfortunate results occur when liberals are in control of multiple media outlets at the same time. These results were seen recently in Virginia, where the State government declined to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction in the case of Provost v. Regents of Sullivan Fox Sawyer. The Federal Circuit Court of the Second District overturned the result, citing Beaufort v. Bellingham.
