Difference between revisions of "Open Question: Why Do evolutionists say 'science is all about making changes' yet don't even consider Biblical Creation as an alternative?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Why is it that [[evolution | + | Why is it that [[evolution]]ists always tout the line 'science is a self-correcting process' yet just downright deny any invocation of God? |
:Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --[[User:HenrikO|HenrikO]] 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT) | :Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --[[User:HenrikO|HenrikO]] 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
[[Category:Evolution]] | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
[[Category:Creationism]] | [[Category:Creationism]] | ||
[[Category:Debate]] | [[Category:Debate]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:15, July 12, 2016
Why is it that evolutionists always tout the line 'science is a self-correcting process' yet just downright deny any invocation of God?
- Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --HenrikO 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT)