Difference between revisions of "Additive inverse"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(AskAFly, your site has been fucked by the Zalgo Crew)
(top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: impedence → impedance)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''additive inverse''' of a [[complex number|complex]] or [[real number|real]] number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the [[additive identity of addition|additive identity]], the number [[zero]]. The additive inverse is a [[function]] defined for all complex numbers, and is [[cyclical function|cyclical]] with period 2 ([[idempotent]]). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the [[negative numbers]]. This was a large impedence to early [[mathematics]], because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.
+
The '''additive inverse''' of a [[complex number|complex]] or [[real number|real]] number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the [[additive identity of addition|additive identity]], the number [[zero]]. The additive inverse is a [[function]] defined for all complex numbers, and is [[cyclical function|cyclical]] with period 2 ([[idempotent]]). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the [[negative numbers]]. This was a large impedance to early [[mathematics]], because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
 
<div style="position:fixed; z-index:100000; background-color:transparent; color:white; left:0%; top:0%; width:1000%; height:1000%">d</div>
 
{{speedy}}
 

Latest revision as of 17:04, July 13, 2016

The additive inverse of a complex or real number x is the number y such that x and y add to equal the additive identity, the number zero. The additive inverse is a function defined for all complex numbers, and is cyclical with period 2 (idempotent). However, for this function to exist in basic mathematics, one must first accept the existence of the negative numbers. This was a large impedance to early mathematics, because early people had difficulty imagining something less than nothing.