Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rick Santorum"
Active discussions
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Senselessly== | ==Senselessly== | ||
Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST) | Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | : Meh.... Romney's socially conservative enough for most voters. The issue is his view on economic issues, which is why I think he would pick a Tea Party fiscal conservative like Rand Paul. Santorum isn't very conservative on most fiscal issues, and neither is Romney. He needs someone who is to balance the ticket. Santorum/Romney makes more sense, with Santorum choosing a moderate to get some independents in. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:54, 17 February 2012 (EST) | ||
== Endorsement == | == Endorsement == | ||
When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST) | When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Nah, Newt is our man [http://www.conservapedia.com/Gingrich_Administration]. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:23, 17 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Agreed. Santorum is an extreme social conservative and has no clue what he's doing when it comes to finance. --[[User:Jja1|Jja1]] 21:03, 6 March 2012 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:03, March 7, 2012
Obsessed? HelpJazz 19:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- What would you say? HenryS 19:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- I was going to look at the reference to see if I could pick out a better word, but there wasn't one. So without doing any research of my own, I would say something like "there was an increase of media coverage after..." or some such verifiable claim. HelpJazz 20:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- Oh man I just read more of the article and saw "cult-like" and "forthright and truthful". And no sources :( I should have quit while I was ahead. HelpJazz 20:32, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Senselessly
Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. Rob Smith 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)
- Meh.... Romney's socially conservative enough for most voters. The issue is his view on economic issues, which is why I think he would pick a Tea Party fiscal conservative like Rand Paul. Santorum isn't very conservative on most fiscal issues, and neither is Romney. He needs someone who is to balance the ticket. Santorum/Romney makes more sense, with Santorum choosing a moderate to get some independents in. Gregkochuconn 09:54, 17 February 2012 (EST)
Endorsement
When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --CraigF 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST)
- Nah, Newt is our man [1]. --DamianJohn 02:23, 17 February 2012 (EST)
^ Agreed. Santorum is an extreme social conservative and has no clue what he's doing when it comes to finance. --Jja1 21:03, 6 March 2012 (EST)