Difference between revisions of "Supreme Court 2012 Term"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Non-lawyers may be curious about what "granting cert" means) |
m (wikify) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has "granted cert" (agreed to hear and decide) several dozen cases for the 2012 Term: | |
| − | ( | + | *the timing of [[Medicare]] reimbursement, ''Sebelius v. Auburn Regional'' (11-1231) |
| + | *possible immunity for local government from [[antitrust]] laws, ''FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health'' (11-1160) | ||
| + | *whether a case with a claim under the [[Fair Labor Standards Act]] (FLSA) becomes moot when defendants offer satisfaction on all of the lone plaintiff's claims, ''Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk'' (11-1059) | ||
| + | *''[[Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA]]'', to decide whether the human rights group has Article III standing to seek prospective equitable relief against wiretapping international communications under 50 U.S.C. 1881a | ||
| + | |||
| + | (add to list) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Writ of certiorari]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:37, December 13, 2020
The U.S. Supreme Court has "granted cert" (agreed to hear and decide) several dozen cases for the 2012 Term:
- the timing of Medicare reimbursement, Sebelius v. Auburn Regional (11-1231)
- possible immunity for local government from antitrust laws, FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health (11-1160)
- whether a case with a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) becomes moot when defendants offer satisfaction on all of the lone plaintiff's claims, Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk (11-1059)
- Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA, to decide whether the human rights group has Article III standing to seek prospective equitable relief against wiretapping international communications under 50 U.S.C. 1881a
(add to list)