Changes

Line 33: Line 33:     
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
 
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
 +
 +
Prior to Elevatorgate, [[Monica Shores]]' ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women?'' criticized the News Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="msmagazine.com">[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine'', 2010</ref>  She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref name="msmagazine.com"/>
    
Post [[Elevatorgate]] controversy, the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] has seen a significant loss of public influence (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).
 
Post [[Elevatorgate]] controversy, the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] has seen a significant loss of public influence (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,935

edits