Changes

553 bytes added ,  18:35, September 8, 2012
Line 20: Line 20:  
Why was my sourced and entirely reasonable edit to the Health Care section removed?  While this site may not 'approve' of Cuba, it's not 'encyclopedia like' to suppress factual information about it, and the information provided was sourced and accurate.  It was certainly a more detailed explanation of how Health Care is actually run in Cuba than the current state to which it was reverted.  [[User:Wonders|Wonders]] 13:18, 8 September 2012 (EDT)
 
Why was my sourced and entirely reasonable edit to the Health Care section removed?  While this site may not 'approve' of Cuba, it's not 'encyclopedia like' to suppress factual information about it, and the information provided was sourced and accurate.  It was certainly a more detailed explanation of how Health Care is actually run in Cuba than the current state to which it was reverted.  [[User:Wonders|Wonders]] 13:18, 8 September 2012 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps calling Cuba's system "excellent" is a bit too subjective. Also, it appears you misused the <nowiki>{{cite web}}</nowiki> template. But other than that, the facts you presented were relevant and your Irish Times source appears to be credible and written by someone with first-hand knowledge of the Cuban health care system. I think the burden is on User:Karajou to defend his reversion. Maybe contact him on his Talk page if he doesn't respond here. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 13:58, 8 September 2012 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps calling Cuba's system "excellent" is a bit too subjective. Also, it appears you misused the <nowiki>{{cite web}}</nowiki> template. But other than that, the facts you presented were relevant and your Irish Times source appears to be credible and written by someone with first-hand knowledge of the Cuban health care system. I think the burden is on User:Karajou to defend his reversion. Maybe contact him on his Talk page if he doesn't respond here. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 13:58, 8 September 2012 (EDT)
 +
::I agree that was too subjective, and I also admit I don't know how to use the template.  But the article currently uses the weasel words "many believe the services provided are alarmingly inferior" without providing any citation for these "many" - one grumble from a failed Presidential Primary candidate does not "many" make, and I cannot find any citation for Hilda Morina's statement, neither in the Conservapedia article nor on the web, nor that she even was in the Cuban Health business.  [[User:Wonders|Wonders]] 14:35, 8 September 2012 (EDT)
48

edits