Difference between revisions of "Arbitration Fairness Act"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(improved) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2015 (HR 2807), which was introduced by Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson in the [[House of Representatives]] and supported by Minnesota Sen. Al Franken, would eliminate forced arbitration clauses and open the floodgates to class actions brought by trial attorneys. | + | The The '''Arbitration Fairness Act''' of 2015 (HR 2807), which was introduced by Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson in the [[House of Representatives]] and supported by Minnesota Sen. Al Franken, would eliminate forced arbitration clauses and open the floodgates to class actions brought by trial attorneys. |
In a nutshell, this Act would reinstate full rights of consumers to sue in court.<ref>http://consumerist.com/2015/04/30/arbitration-fairness-act-would-reinstate-consumers-right-to-sue-in-court/</ref> | In a nutshell, this Act would reinstate full rights of consumers to sue in court.<ref>http://consumerist.com/2015/04/30/arbitration-fairness-act-would-reinstate-consumers-right-to-sue-in-court/</ref> | ||
== Heading text == | == Heading text == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 21:19, February 24, 2017
The The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2015 (HR 2807), which was introduced by Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson in the House of Representatives and supported by Minnesota Sen. Al Franken, would eliminate forced arbitration clauses and open the floodgates to class actions brought by trial attorneys.
In a nutshell, this Act would reinstate full rights of consumers to sue in court.[1]