SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 02:31, April 5, 2016
, 02:31, April 5, 2016→Getting blocked for "adult content"
:::In 2014, a global news channel which broadcasts documentaries about current topics, reported concerning secular Europe: "Bestiality is having a weird renaissance in Europe."[https://sites.google.com/site/newsreport3738/] The pro-evolution ''Scientific American'' on bestiality: "After all, we are animals....".[http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_bestiality#Commentary_by_the_Scientific_American_and_evolutionary_belief_and_bestiality][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:22, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
:::In 2014, a global news channel which broadcasts documentaries about current topics, reported concerning secular Europe: "Bestiality is having a weird renaissance in Europe."[https://sites.google.com/site/newsreport3738/] The pro-evolution ''Scientific American'' on bestiality: "After all, we are animals....".[http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_bestiality#Commentary_by_the_Scientific_American_and_evolutionary_belief_and_bestiality][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:22, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
::::Different people have different tollerences. For me, antisemitism was the "deal breaker." Perhaps SamHB has a different "deal breaker" so I can understand how he feels. The facts are that we live in a world surrounded by automated systems that pass judgment upon us. "Parental controls" are based on looking for key words, so even "Scientific American" or "National Geographic" will get into trouble at some point. I would hope that (1) Conservapedia has announced standards in its Commandments about being family friendly and enforces them and (2) there are people and/or systems in place to untangle content filters when Conservapedia gets an X rating. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:02, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
::::Different people have different tollerences. For me, antisemitism was the "deal breaker." Perhaps SamHB has a different "deal breaker" so I can understand how he feels. The facts are that we live in a world surrounded by automated systems that pass judgment upon us. "Parental controls" are based on looking for key words, so even "Scientific American" or "National Geographic" will get into trouble at some point. I would hope that (1) Conservapedia has announced standards in its Commandments about being family friendly and enforces them and (2) there are people and/or systems in place to untangle content filters when Conservapedia gets an X rating. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:02, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
:::::Actually, this isn't a "deal breaker" for me personally. I consider the antisemitism to be more serious, just as JDano does. Perhaps because any sensible person will dismiss the bestiality stuff as childish. The point of my posting was that, while the bestiality stuff getting flagged didn't surprise me in the least, the flagging of [[Liberal denial]] '''did''' surprise me. Unfortunately, I haven't looked through the Liberal denial page to try to figure out what the problem is—the writing style is too chaotic. Perhaps someone else can look at it. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:31, 4 April 2016 (EDT)