Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − +
Reverted edits by HenryIV (Talk); changed back to last version by Conservative
'''Creation science''' is an absurd effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. There is only one word to deefine how jerk are their members: jerk.
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically,
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically,
a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]