Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,907
edits
Changes
User talk:DavidB4 (view source)
Revision as of 06:24, September 18, 2016
, 06:24, September 18, 2016→re: Sporadic Solvent: new section
:The Pence image we have now is good expect for the fact that it is old, by at least seven years. I newer image would be nice in my opinion, even though it doesn't have to be that specific one. There are some other good Trump photos that I am tempted to request instead.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13.jpg][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped.jpg] Is there any you prefer? Should I also ask a wider audience as well? Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:35, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
:The Pence image we have now is good expect for the fact that it is old, by at least seven years. I newer image would be nice in my opinion, even though it doesn't have to be that specific one. There are some other good Trump photos that I am tempted to request instead.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13.jpg][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped.jpg] Is there any you prefer? Should I also ask a wider audience as well? Thanks! --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:35, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
::Good point about the Pence one--an update wouldn't be a bad idea then. As for Trump, I think either of those you just linked to would work. Personally, I like the more "professional" look of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13.jpg Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13], but the "dramatic" look of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped.jpg Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped] is okay too. Asking a bigger audience wouldn't hurt--you can certainly do that.--[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 22:49, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
::Good point about the Pence one--an update wouldn't be a bad idea then. As for Trump, I think either of those you just linked to would work. Personally, I like the more "professional" look of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13.jpg Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_13], but the "dramatic" look of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped.jpg Donald_Trump_(29273256122)_-_Cropped] is okay too. Asking a bigger audience wouldn't hurt--you can certainly do that.--[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 22:49, 10 September 2016 (EDT)
== re: Sporadic Solvent ==
I thought Sporadic Solvent was a spammer who was pushing some product. I didn't know that he/she had made an edit. But the Greek entry doesn't seem to be an improvement anyways. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:24, 18 September 2016 (EDT)