Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,708
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 08:18, January 9, 2017
, 08:18, January 9, 2017→Alexa rank: New section
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:15, 9 January 2017 (EST)
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:15, 9 January 2017 (EST)
:A better example of conservatism actually selling is Milo's book deal with Simon & Schuster.[http://www.vox.com/culture/2017/1/3/14119080/milo-yiannopoulos-book-deal-simon-schuster-dangerous-boycott] Historically, the only conservatives the "big five" book publishers dealt with were those with bankable personalities, i.e. people who had a built-in audiences due to regular appearances on Fox News or whatever. Only Regnery would publish books by lesser-known conservatives. Liberals think Al Franken is a great comedian because he wrote ''Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot''. Why can't they see the humor in “[http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/05/fat-shaming-is-good-science/ Science Proves It: Fat-Shaming Works]”? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:09, 4 January 2017 (EST)
:A better example of conservatism actually selling is Milo's book deal with Simon & Schuster.[http://www.vox.com/culture/2017/1/3/14119080/milo-yiannopoulos-book-deal-simon-schuster-dangerous-boycott] Historically, the only conservatives the "big five" book publishers dealt with were those with bankable personalities, i.e. people who had a built-in audiences due to regular appearances on Fox News or whatever. Only Regnery would publish books by lesser-known conservatives. Liberals think Al Franken is a great comedian because he wrote ''Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot''. Why can't they see the humor in “[http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/05/fat-shaming-is-good-science/ Science Proves It: Fat-Shaming Works]”? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:09, 4 January 2017 (EST)
== Alexa rank ==
User:Conservative was "crowing" about how Conservapedia in April of last year had reached 100,000 on the Alexa world rank. As of today [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com], it's reached a global ranking of 55,877.
Is this a new record? Does the increase reflect only a seasonal factor or impressive growth? Do you suppose people around the world want to know more about conservatism now that conservatives have outvoted the opposition to help elect their preference to be the next President? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:18, 9 January 2017 (EST)