Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,969
edits
Changes
→Potential policy: Conservapedia topic bans/main page talk bans
::The main purpose of the topic bans is for editor retention purposes. In certain cases, if topic bans were be used instead of a broader block of editing the entire wiki, the editor would be retained rather than permanently lost or lost for an extended period. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:34, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
::The main purpose of the topic bans is for editor retention purposes. In certain cases, if topic bans were be used instead of a broader block of editing the entire wiki, the editor would be retained rather than permanently lost or lost for an extended period. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:34, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
:::Also, a blocker can create a resource such as this: [[User:Conservative/My topic bans]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:43, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
:::Also, a blocker can create a resource such as this: [[User:Conservative/My topic bans]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:43, 5 May 2017 (EDT)
::::It's like being a guidance counsellor, you have to help an editor find his/her/their/its niche, and channel their energies into into it. Some editors may excel at content, other's could have organizational skills serving on a committee to regulate proofreeding, quality control, template and page design, dispute resolution, disciplinary action, policy development, etc etc etc. To build a community, you gotta lift the 90/10 rule to allow user interaction and collaboration. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]</sup>`
=== The beauty of the topic ban ===
=== The beauty of the topic ban ===