Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coal mining"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(?) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Why was a critique of Spanish renewable energy generation added to an article about coal mining? Doesn’t make any sense. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 13:44, 30 June 2017 (EDT) | Why was a critique of Spanish renewable energy generation added to an article about coal mining? Doesn’t make any sense. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 13:44, 30 June 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | :It shows that moving away from coal power and coal mining, whether for environmental benefits or to improve the health of coal miners, is not necessarily beneficial. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:52, 30 June 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, June 30, 2017
| ! | Part of this article was copied from Conservapedia but the copied text was originally written by me, RJJensen (under the name Richard Jensen) and does not include alterations made by others on that site. |
RJJensen 22:31, 14 November 2008 (EST)
Updates Needed
Some of the information in this article is out of date. For instance, coal is now one of the most expensive means of electrical production. Natural gas has surpassed coal as a major energy source. Changes should be made for the sake of accuracy. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_08_04.html https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
- Anti-coal policy and anti-coal government regulations raised the cost of coal. Still likely cheaper than most other sources but you do have a link! Maybe research other nations use of coal first. --Jpatt 21:45, 19 April 2017 (EDT)
Why was a critique of Spanish renewable energy generation added to an article about coal mining? Doesn’t make any sense. --GinnyS (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2017 (EDT)