Difference between revisions of "Talk:C (programming language)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:C programmin language moved to Talk:C programming language) |
(Why protected?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
C does not have an "integrated inline assembler". Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899. Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. [[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | C does not have an "integrated inline assembler". Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899. Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. [[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why is this article protected? [[User:Coas|Coas]] 00:44, 23 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:44, February 23, 2008
C does not have an "integrated inline assembler". Although I believe K&R listed 'asm' as a reserved word, its use was never specified in any vender-neutral way, and it is not included in the current definition of the C language, ISO 9899. Many C compilers provide assembly escaped as extensions, but that is not at all the same thing as the language providing it. Jtl 04:37, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Why is this article protected? Coas 00:44, 23 February 2008 (EST)