Difference between revisions of "Scientific method"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Deleted meaningless example - nobody asserts that *only* human actions are responsible for climate change, and there is plenty of dispute over the issue, despite broad scientific consensus.)
(create)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Scientific Method''' is a procedure for the dispassionate inquiry into any and all phenomena. 
+
#REDIRET [[Scientific theory]]
−
It involves the careful collection of data and the development of [[Theory|theories]] which organize those facts into [[Falsifiablity|falsifiable]] explanations. 
 
−
When theories move away from falsifiability and become dogmatic, then we say they are not scientific (see [[pseudoscience]]).
 
−
 
 
−
Each scientific theory is built up as a deliberately fragile structure, like a house of cards, that can collapse if any foundational principles are proven to be false.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
==The four steps of the scientific method {{fact}}==
 
−
 
 
−
1. '''Careful observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.''' (I observe that a heavy steel ship floats on water)
 
−
 
 
−
2. '''Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena.''' (I propose that it is the overall density of the ship, rather than its weight that determines if it floats)
 
−
 
 
−
3. '''Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict the results of new observations.''' (To see whether my hypothesis holds true, I predict that any object that is less dense than water will float and any object more dense than water will sink; I test various objects that are more or less dense than water by putting them in a tub.)
 
−
 
 
−
4. '''Replication of the experiments and results by independent experimenters.''' (rather than take my word for it, my neighbors try the same experiment and look for any flaws in my methodology).
 
−
Mathematical derivations are also commonly used to support a theory and predict results, but only an experiment can provide conclusive evidence (relativity, for example, could not have been predicted by math alone).
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
==References==
 
−
<references/>
 
−
 
 
−
* http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html
 
−
* http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html
 
−
* http://biology.clc.uc.edu/Courses/bio104/sci_meth.htm
 
−
[[category:science]]
 

Revision as of 18:51, May 17, 2007