| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | The Republicans retained control of the Senate, with the seat in [[Arizona]] having been stolen through electoral fraud.<ref>http://ktar.com/story/2299990/arizona-gop-claims-maricopa-county-destroyed-some-voting-evidence/</ref> | | The Republicans retained control of the Senate, with the seat in [[Arizona]] having been stolen through electoral fraud.<ref>http://ktar.com/story/2299990/arizona-gop-claims-maricopa-county-destroyed-some-voting-evidence/</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | The alleged "Blue wave" did not materialized, however rampant [[voter fraud]] in heavy Democrat districts did occur.<ref>https://twitter.com/Str8DonLemon/status/1061991384369020929</ref> | + | The alleged "Blue wave" did not materialize; however, rampant [[voter fraud]] in heavy Democrat districts did occur.<ref>https://twitter.com/Str8DonLemon/status/1061991384369020929</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | In the 115th Congress the [[Republican Party]] held 235 seats House of Representatives to [[Democrat]]s' 193 seats, with seven seats vacant. In the Senate the Republican Party held 51 seats. The Democrats held 47 seats, and the remaining two were held by independents too ashamed to call themselves Democrats publicly yet caucus with the Democrat party. Of the 33 seats up for election, the Democrats had to defend 25 (two of my which are held by independents), while Republicans had only eight seats to defend. The Democrat Party tried to defend 10 seats in states that [[Donald Trump]] won over [[Hillary Clinton]] in 2016. | + | In the 115th Congress the [[Republican Party]] held 235 seats House of Representatives to [[Democrat]]s' 193 seats, with seven seats vacant. In the Senate the Republican Party held 51 seats. The Democrats held 47 seats, and the remaining two were held by Independents too ashamed to call themselves Democrats publicly, though they caucus with the Democrat party. Of the 33 seats up for reelection, the Democrats had to defend 25 (two of which are held by Independents), while Republicans had only eight seats to defend. The Democrat Party tried to defend 10 seats in states that [[Donald Trump]] won over [[Hillary Clinton]] in 2016. |
| | | | |
| − | Despite [[liberal media]] [[fake news]], the Democrats had to win 48 House seats and seven Senate seats to qualify historically as a "wave election."<ref>[https://ballotpedia.org/Scott_Rasmussen%27s_Number_of_the_Day_for_June_25,_2018]</ref> Increasing [[leftist]] violence and resistance to accepting the results of the [[2016 presidential election]] was an important issue. <ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/trump-resistance-continues-slide-toward-violence/</ref><ref>Although analysis by the [[Cato Institute]] and ''[[New York Times]]'' showed leftist-motivated violence on the rise since 2016 with killings 2.5 times higher than right wing extremists, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/term-alt-left-came the numbers ''do not'' include murders of [[police officer]]s by [[Black Lives Matter]] activists. https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/14/us/police-officers-fatal-shooting-line-duty-nationwide/index.html</ref> Democrats relied on [[corrupt]] local election officials and their corrupt media allies failure to report and expose it, and [[social media]] [[censorship]] of [[conservative]] voices for their limited success. | + | Despite [[liberal media]] [[fake news]], the Democrats had to win 48 House seats and seven Senate seats to qualify historically as a "wave election."<ref>[https://ballotpedia.org/Scott_Rasmussen%27s_Number_of_the_Day_for_June_25,_2018]</ref> Increasing [[leftist]] violence and resistance to accepting the results of the [[2016 presidential election]] was an important issue. <ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/trump-resistance-continues-slide-toward-violence/</ref><ref>Although analysis by the [[Cato Institute]] and ''[[New York Times]]'' showed leftist-motivated violence on the rise since 2016 with killings 2.5 times higher than right wing extremists, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/term-alt-left-came the numbers ''do not'' include murders of [[police officer]]s by [[Black Lives Matter]] activists. https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/14/us/police-officers-fatal-shooting-line-duty-nationwide/index.html</ref> Democrats relied on [[corrupt]] local election officials and their corrupt media allies' failure to report and expose it, and [[social media]] [[censorship]] of [[conservative]] voices for their limited success. |
| | | | |
| − | Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]], having squandered a record $70 million of other people's money in a loosing bid against [[Ted Cruz]] for the [[Texas]] Senate seat, is now considered a qualified leading contender for president by Democrats and the liberal media. | + | Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]], having squandered a record $70 million of other people's money in a losing bid against [[Ted Cruz]] for the [[Texas]] Senate seat, is now considered a qualified leading contender for President by Democrats and the liberal media. |
| | | | |
| | ==Issues== | | ==Issues== |
| − | [[File:Democrats 2018.png|right|300px|thumb|Democrats took their message of chaos and disruption to the street.]] An election eve poll of registered voters one week before the election found 30% view Trump as the most important issue, 22% rated the economy, followed by 15% who rank [[illegal immigration]] and 14% who say the same of Obamacare. 51% gave the president good or excellent marks for his handling of the [[economy]], while 33% rated his performance in this area as poor. Overall Trump’s approval rating was higher than [[Barack Obama]]’s at this stage of his presidency.<ref>[http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/rating_president_trump_on_the_issues_oct29]</ref> | + | [[File:Democrats 2018.png|right|300px|thumb|Democrats took their message of chaos and disruption to the street.]] An election eve poll of registered voters one week before the election found 30% view Trump as the most important issue, while 22% rated the economy, followed by 15% who rank [[illegal immigration]] and 14% who say the same of Obamacare. 51% gave the President good or excellent marks for his handling of the [[economy]], while 33% rated his performance in this area as poor. Overall, Trump’s approval rating was higher than [[Barack Obama]]’s at this stage of his Presidency.<ref>[http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/rating_president_trump_on_the_issues_oct29]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | Despite a $50 million fundraising advantage from [[Hollywood]], [[Wall Street]], and [[globalism|global]] [[elitism|elites]], the Democratic party leadership's advocacy of mob [[violence]] to advance [[socialism]] became a key issue.<ref>https://youtu.be/hlMIyae9-ZU</ref> The [[Kavanaugh smear]], Democrat disruptions of the orderly working of [[Congress]], and the Democrats' denial of [[due process]] rights energized the Republican base.<ref>https://youtu.be/iW4YwZtRAUY</ref> | | Despite a $50 million fundraising advantage from [[Hollywood]], [[Wall Street]], and [[globalism|global]] [[elitism|elites]], the Democratic party leadership's advocacy of mob [[violence]] to advance [[socialism]] became a key issue.<ref>https://youtu.be/hlMIyae9-ZU</ref> The [[Kavanaugh smear]], Democrat disruptions of the orderly working of [[Congress]], and the Democrats' denial of [[due process]] rights energized the Republican base.<ref>https://youtu.be/iW4YwZtRAUY</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]] of [[Texas]], having wasted a record $70 million to loose, is now considered a qualified leading contender by Democrats and the liberal media for 2020 presidential nomination. | + | Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]] of [[Texas]], having wasted a record $70 million, is now considered a qualified leading contender by Democrats and the liberal media for 2020 Presidential nomination. |
| | | | |
| | ===Supreme Court=== | | ===Supreme Court=== |
| | :{{See also|Kavanaugh smear|MeToo movement}} | | :{{See also|Kavanaugh smear|MeToo movement}} |
| | [[File:Sarsour hearing-500x281.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Linda Sarsour]] removed from the hearing room. Sarsour is a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and spokesperson for leftist causes.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/opinion/womens-march-progressives-hate.html</ref>]] | | [[File:Sarsour hearing-500x281.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Linda Sarsour]] removed from the hearing room. Sarsour is a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and spokesperson for leftist causes.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/opinion/womens-march-progressives-hate.html</ref>]] |
| − | ''[[The New Yorker]]'' publicized in March 2012 that [[Brett Kavanaugh]] was the most likely next nominee if a Republican were to win the election.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court</ref> Within a few months, [[Christine Blasey Ford]] for the first time allegedly told her therapist that she had been fondled at a drinking party and felt threatened. The therapist notes however do not name Kavanaugh. | + | ''[[The New Yorker]]'' publicized in March 2012 that [[Brett Kavanaugh]] was the most likely next nominee if a Republican were to win the election.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court</ref> Within a few months, [[Christine Blasey Ford]] for the first time allegedly told her therapist that she had been fondled at a drinking party and felt threatened. The therapist notes, however, do not name Kavanaugh. |
| | | | |
| − | In the Spring of 2018 [[President Donald Trump]] nominated Judge Kavanaugh to the [[Supreme Court]]. Ricki Seidman, who orchestrated the 1991 [[Clarence Thomas]] smear mapped out the plan to defame Kavanaugh in July 2018: {{quotebox|"Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee."<ref>[https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A Begins at 3:20.]</ref>}} Like the attack on Justice Thomas, outrageous last minute personal smears were intended to force the game into extra innings. | + | In the Spring of 2018, [[President Donald Trump]] nominated Judge Kavanaugh to the [[Supreme Court]]. Ricki Seidman, who orchestrated the 1991 [[Clarence Thomas]] smear, mapped out the plan to defame Kavanaugh in July 2018: {{quotebox|"Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee."<ref>[https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A Begins at 3:20.]</ref>}} Like the attack on Justice Thomas, outrageous last minute personal smears were intended to erroneously waste the time of Congress. |
| | | | |
| | ''[[The Washington Post]]'' first published Blasey Ford's allegations in a letter under an anonymous op-ed byline. The op-ed named Kavanaugh as one of the boys at the drinking party in high school. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]] did not ask the FBI to investigate when she received the letter in July 2018, held it for two months during hearings, then passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo'' when the regular hearings ended.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> In the interim Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph test in August 2018. The allegations were withheld by Feinstein and the Democrats from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing investigation and vetting process.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/18/lindsey-graham-ford-no-intention-coming-forward-whyd-take-polygraph-early-august/</ref> | | ''[[The Washington Post]]'' first published Blasey Ford's allegations in a letter under an anonymous op-ed byline. The op-ed named Kavanaugh as one of the boys at the drinking party in high school. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]] did not ask the FBI to investigate when she received the letter in July 2018, held it for two months during hearings, then passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo'' when the regular hearings ended.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> In the interim Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph test in August 2018. The allegations were withheld by Feinstein and the Democrats from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing investigation and vetting process.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/18/lindsey-graham-ford-no-intention-coming-forward-whyd-take-polygraph-early-august/</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Then, during the period in which the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed the vote 10 days to accommodate Blasey Ford's testimony, the ''[[New Yorker]]'' published an allegation Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drinking party at [[Yale]] to a female classmate.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez</ref> The ''New Yorker'' wrote: {{quotebox|"The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident...''The New Yorker'' has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."}} The accuser did give the ''New Yorker'' six names to support her claim. Six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation. And when the ''New Yorker'' interviewed them, '''''all six''''' said it never happened, 100% of the evidence discovered by the ''New Yorker'' refuted the claim, yet the ''New Yorker'' still published the article. | + | Then, during the period in which the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed the vote 10 days to accommodate Blasey Ford's testimony, the ''[[New Yorker]]'' published an allegation Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drinking party at [[Yale]] to a female classmate.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez</ref> The ''New Yorker'' wrote: {{quotebox|"The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident...''The New Yorker'' has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."}} The accuser did give the ''New Yorker'' six names to support her claim, six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation. And when the ''New Yorker'' interviewed them, '''''all six''''' said it never happened, and although 100% of the evidence discovered by the ''New Yorker'' refuted the claim, yet the ''New Yorker'' still published the article. |
| | | | |
| | In the end Judge Kavanaugh was confirmed, and the Democrats roundly condemned for their sickening conduct. | | In the end Judge Kavanaugh was confirmed, and the Democrats roundly condemned for their sickening conduct. |
| Line 47: |
Line 47: |
| | [[File:Migrant-caravan-collage 451.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Migrant caravan clashes with Mexican border police.]] | | [[File:Migrant-caravan-collage 451.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Migrant caravan clashes with Mexican border police.]] |
| | :{{Main article|2018 Migrant caravan}} | | :{{Main article|2018 Migrant caravan}} |
| − | Weeks before the election, [[George Soros]] [[front group]]s and human trafficers organized a migrant mob in [[Honduras]] to storm U.S. border control.<ref>https://youtu.be/fLJ3p8yHdWk</ref> Soros employed similiar tactics in the [[European migrant crisis]] which has de-stabilized European society. | + | Weeks before the election, [[George Soros]] [[front group]]s and human traffickers organized a migrant mob in [[Honduras]] to storm U.S. border control.<ref>https://youtu.be/fLJ3p8yHdWk</ref> Soros employed similiar tactics in the [[European migrant crisis]] which has destabilized European society. |
| | | | |
| | The heavily financed horde overwhelmed the token resistance from the Mexican police and advanced north toward the Southern U.S. border. The ''[[Associated Press]]'' described a “growing army of migrants resumes march toward US.”<ref>https://www.apnews.com/b709e05ec83c49e6876ff612141ae942</ref> The group has been enjoined by [[ideological]] [[comrade]]s from within Mexico. The group claims to be fleeing [[violence]] in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, yet the group deployed violence against the Mexican police who were vastly outnumbered.<ref>https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1058685478164144128</ref> | | The heavily financed horde overwhelmed the token resistance from the Mexican police and advanced north toward the Southern U.S. border. The ''[[Associated Press]]'' described a “growing army of migrants resumes march toward US.”<ref>https://www.apnews.com/b709e05ec83c49e6876ff612141ae942</ref> The group has been enjoined by [[ideological]] [[comrade]]s from within Mexico. The group claims to be fleeing [[violence]] in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, yet the group deployed violence against the Mexican police who were vastly outnumbered.<ref>https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1058685478164144128</ref> |
| Line 61: |
Line 61: |
| | ===Healthcare=== | | ===Healthcare=== |
| | :{{Main article|Obamacare}} | | :{{Main article|Obamacare}} |
| − | Healthcare continued to be a major issue, with 56% of voters in pre-election surveys saying [[free market]] competition between insurance companies would do more to reduce health care costs whereas only 29% of registered voters thought government intervention would be better at reducing costs. Survey results on this question have changed little since April 2013.<ref>[http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law_oct22]</ref> | + | Healthcare continued to be a major issue, with 56% of voters in pre-election surveys saying [[free market]] competition between insurance companies would do more to reduce health care costs, whereas only 29% of registered voters thought government intervention would be better at reducing costs. Survey results on this question have changed little since April 2013.<ref>[http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law_oct22]</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | One of President Trump's first actions was repealing the requirement of Democrats on everyone to purchase health insurance policies for coverage they may never need (for example, men were required to buy [[abortion]] coverage and women to buy [[prostate]] [[cancer]] coverage) and [[monetary]] penalties for failure to comply with government dictates.<ref>Obamacare was wholey a Democrat mandate. No Republicans voted for Obamacare. There was no [[bipartisan]] nationwide [[consensus]] by any measure. Costs escalated dramatically after passage.</ref> | + | One of President Trump's first actions was repealing the requirement of Democrats on everyone to purchase health insurance policies for coverage they may never need (for example, men were required to buy [[abortion]] coverage and women to buy [[prostate]] [[cancer]] coverage) and [[monetary]] penalties for failure to comply with government dictates.<ref>Obamacare was wholly a Democrat mandate. No Republicans voted for Obamacare. There was no [[bipartisan]] nationwide [[consensus]] by any measure. Costs escalated dramatically after passage.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ====Falling premiums==== | | ====Falling premiums==== |
| − | As of 2018 health insurance rates fell for the first in history.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/11/politics/obamacare-premiums-2019/index.html</ref> The average premiums of $124 per month dramatically contrasted with Obamacare plans whose monthly premiums averaged $393.<ref>https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/407158-how-the-gop-fixed-the-worst-of-obamacare</ref> Even the liberal think tank, the Urban Institute proclaimed that what Trump did allowed 1.7 million previously uninsured Americans to receive insurance coverage, while enabling 2.5 million more to benefit from much lower premiums.<ref>https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/liberal-think-tank-refutes-case-against-trumps-health-insurance-deregulation-10976.html</ref> | + | As of 2018, health insurance rates fell for the first in history.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/11/politics/obamacare-premiums-2019/index.html</ref> The average premiums of $124 per month dramatically contrasted with Obamacare plans, whose monthly premiums averaged $393.<ref>https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/407158-how-the-gop-fixed-the-worst-of-obamacare</ref> Even the liberal think tank the Urban Institute proclaimed that what Trump did allowed 1.7 million previously uninsured Americans to receive insurance coverage, while enabling 2.5 million more to benefit from much lower premiums.<ref>https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/liberal-think-tank-refutes-case-against-trumps-health-insurance-deregulation-10976.html</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ====Medicare and Medicaid==== | | ====Medicare and Medicaid==== |
| − | As of 2018 Medicare and Medicaid increase in cost is $1.50.<ref>https://goldrushcam.com/sierrasuntimes/index.php/news/local-news/16025-centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services-announces-2019-medicare-parts-a-b-premiums-and-deductibles</ref> [[Progressive]] [[socialist]]s and Democrats proposed a doubling of taxes for a [[collectivist]] single-payer system they called, "Medicate for All."<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-07-30/study-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6-trillion</ref> | + | As of 2018, Medicare and Medicaid's increase in cost is $1.50.<ref>https://goldrushcam.com/sierrasuntimes/index.php/news/local-news/16025-centers-for-medicare-medicaid-services-announces-2019-medicare-parts-a-b-premiums-and-deductibles</ref> [[Progressive]] [[socialist]]s and Democrats proposed a doubling of taxes for a [[collectivist]] single-payer system they called "Medicate for All."<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-07-30/study-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6-trillion</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ===Leftist mobs and violence=== | | ===Leftist mobs and violence=== |
| | [[File:Maddogpac.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|Democratic fundraisers openly called for the murder of elected Republican officials.]] | | [[File:Maddogpac.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|Democratic fundraisers openly called for the murder of elected Republican officials.]] |
| | :{{See also|Left-wing violence in the Trump era}} | | :{{See also|Left-wing violence in the Trump era}} |
| − | When one uses [[Google]] to investigate "leftist violence" and other associated terms, the majority of search results (thanks to selective liberal-biased censorship and manipulating of those results by Google) return "right-wing violence," as if the phenomenea of leftist motivated attacks do not exist or is unmonitored. Yet daily for two years leftists have openly practiced criminal behavior in the form of violence, intimidation and threats - often worn as a badge of "honor" by [[liberal elite]]s in media, [[Hollywood]], academia, and the Democrat Party,<ref> | + | When one uses [[Google]] to investigate "leftist violence" and other associated terms, the majority of search results (thanks to selective liberal-biased censorship and manipulating of those results by Google) return "right-wing violence," as if the phenomena of leftist motivated attacks do not exist or is unmonitored; yet daily, for two years, leftists have openly practiced criminal behavior in the forms of violence, intimidation and threats - often worn as a badge of "honor" by [[liberal elite]]s in media, [[Hollywood]], academia, and the Democrat Party,<ref> |
| | https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/16/this-list-of-attacks-against-conservatives-is-mind-blowing/</ref> although common sense dictates that such behavior is, in fact, a badge of shame against them as seen by the majority of the public. | | https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/16/this-list-of-attacks-against-conservatives-is-mind-blowing/</ref> although common sense dictates that such behavior is, in fact, a badge of shame against them as seen by the majority of the public. |
| | | | |