Changes

==False Claim Tulsi Gabbard Campaign has been shunted by the DNC==

==False Claim Tulsi Gabbard Campaign has been shunted by the DNC==

Tulsi Gabbard has consistently polled below 2%, since she announced her candidacy early this year.<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</ref> Gabbard campaign and her key conservative media supporters, including U.S. based Russian media, claim her poll results are illegitimate, but still count for everyone else, especially Kamala Harris, her current key rival.  Whenever Tulsi polls greater than 3%, her campaign announces a permanent victory on social media, however when her results drop back to 0-1%, it's rejected again as illegit, but still counts for all the other candidates. Except for New Hampshire, where Tulsi is currently polling at 5%, as of Nov. 25, 2019, and in 5th place, Gabbard is polling at less than 2% in all other regions and nationally.  Although Tulsi Gabbard has reached the single donor threshold for each debate, she continues to fall short in her national and state polling results, as the likely explanation for being disqualified from debates.  Tulsi Gabbard is just not that popular with the general population of voters, especially conservatives, and Trump supporters.

Tulsi Gabbard has consistently polled below 2%, since she announced her candidacy early this year.<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</ref> Gabbard campaign and her key conservative media supporters<ref>https://21stcenturywire.com/2019/08/26/gabbard-is-victim-of-dncs-rigged-debate-criteria/</ref>, including U.S. based Russian media, claim her poll results are illegitimate, but still count for everyone else, especially Kamala Harris, her current key rival.  Whenever Tulsi polls greater than 3%, her campaign announces a permanent victory on social media, however when her results drop back to 0-1%, it's rejected again as illegit, but still counts for all the other candidates. Except in New Hampshire, where Tulsi is currently polling at 5%, as of Nov. 25, 2019, and in 5th place, Gabbard is polling at less than 2% in all other states including Iowa, and nationally.  Although Tulsi Gabbard has reached the single donor threshold for each debate, she continues to fall short in her national and state polling results, as the likely explanation for being disqualified.  Tulsi Gabbard is just not that popular with the general population of voters, especially conservatives and Trump supporters. Tulsi campaign appears to mimic Trump's 2016 campaign claim of victimhood by the media.  Tulsi has questioned why mainstream media attacks a fellow Democrat, when their job is to solely attack President Trump and the Republican Party?

Gabbard said in an interview, just before Harvard professor [[Lawrence Lessig]] hosted her at a well-attended “Democracy Town Hall” in [[New Hampshire]], "People who have supported [[Bernie Sanders]] in the past are coming to my campaign now."

Gabbard said in an interview, just before Harvard professor [[Lawrence Lessig]] hosted her at a well-attended “Democracy Town Hall” in [[New Hampshire]], "People who have supported [[Bernie Sanders]] in the past are coming to my campaign now." Gabbard's statement isn't reflected in her poll results however, which remain stubbornly stuck below 2% in national and individual state polls<ref>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_presidential_primary-6276.html</ref>.  The key to understanding the Tulsi Gabbard's campaign, is it's a combination of contradictions, false statements, flip-flops, and clever diversions, which are all easily verifiable, if you simply come from the point of view that you're being deliberately lied to, and vet her campaign messages with fact checking.

===Google's election meddling===

===Google's election meddling===

Gabbard is suing [[Google]] for $50 million for [[censorship]] of her campaign ads.<ref>https://thehill.com/policy/technology/454746-tulsi-gabbard-sues-google-over-censorship-claims</ref>  Google blocked her ads account shortly after the first Democrat presidential debate, when Gabbard became the most-searched-for candidate in the Democrat field.

Gabbard is suing [[Google]] for $50 million for [[censorship]] of her campaign ads.<ref>https://thehill.com/policy/technology/454746-tulsi-gabbard-sues-google-over-censorship-claims</ref>  Google blocked her ads account shortly after the first Democrat presidential debate, when Gabbard became the most-searched-for candidate in the Democrat field.  Two days after the first debate however, Tulsi's poll results collapsed back to 0-1% in national polls according to Real Clear Politics.

Gabbard's complaint accuses Google of censoring the candidate at the very moment when millions of Americans wanted to learn more about her. It also accuses Google of sending Gabbard's campaign emails to people's Gmail spam folders at a “disproportionately high rate.”  The campaign seeks a legal injunction against Google to prevent further election meddling, as well as $50 million in damages.  According to Gabbard's legal complaint against Google:

Gabbard's complaint accuses Google of censoring the candidate at the very moment when millions of Americans wanted to learn more about her. It also accuses Google of sending Gabbard's campaign emails to people's Gmail spam folders at a “disproportionately high rate.”  The campaign seeks a legal injunction against Google to prevent further election meddling, as well as $50 million in damages.  According to Gabbard's legal complaint against Google:

{{Quotebox|At the height of Gabbard’s popularity among Internet searchers in the immediate hours after the debate ended, and in the thick of the critical post-debate period (when television viewers, radio listeners, newspaper read-ers, and millions of other Americans are discussing and searching for presidential candidates), Google suspended Tulsi’s Google Ads account without warning.<br><br>For hours, as millions of Americans searched Google for information about Tulsi, and as Tulsi was trying, through Google, to speak to them, her Google Ads account was arbitrarily and forcibly taken offline. Throughout this period, the Campaign worked frantically to gather more information about the suspension; to get through to someone at Google who could get the Account back online; and to understand and remedy the restraint that had been placed on Tulsi’s speech—at precisely the moment when everyone wanted to hear from her.}}

{{Quotebox|At the height of Gabbard’s popularity among Internet searchers in the immediate hours after the debate ended, and in the thick of the critical post-debate period (when television viewers, radio listeners, newspaper read-ers, and millions of other Americans are discussing and searching for presidential candidates), Google suspended Tulsi’s Google Ads account without warning.<br><br>For hours, as millions of Americans searched Google for information about Tulsi, and as Tulsi was trying, through Google, to speak to them, her Google Ads account was arbitrarily and forcibly taken offline. Throughout this period, the Campaign worked frantically to gather more information about the suspension; to get through to someone at Google who could get the Account back online; and to understand and remedy the restraint that had been placed on Tulsi’s speech—at precisely the moment when everyone wanted to hear from her.}}

The legal complaint argues that Google could have a nefarious impact on American democracy if its behavior is allowed to continue unchecked. This is the viewpoint of Dr. Robert Epstein, who says the Silicon Valley Masters of the Universe will “go all out” to influence the 2020 election.

The legal complaint argues that Google could have a nefarious impact on American democracy if its behavior is allowed to continue unchecked. This is the viewpoint of Dr. Robert Epstein, who says the Silicon Valley Masters of the Universe will “go all out” to influence the 2020 election.

In a series of Tweets, the Hawaii Democrat said Google's actions “reveals the danger of their dominance & how the dominance of big tech over public discourse threatens core American values.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/07/25/tulsi-gabbard-sues-google-for-censorship-of-ads/</ref>

In a series of Tweets, the Hawaii Democrat said Google's actions “reveals the danger of their dominance & how the dominance of big tech over public discourse threatens core American values.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/07/25/tulsi-gabbard-sues-google-for-censorship-of-ads/</ref>  This is likely another publicity stunt by Gabbard's campaign, similar to announcing she was boycotting the 4th Debate, only to flip-flop her positions a few days later, to say she would appear after all.<ref>https://www.theringer.com/2019/10/18/20920600/tulsi-gabbard-presidential-primary-rigged-2020-election</ref>

After Hillary's Clinton's xenophobic smear, [[Steven Crowder]] demonstrated during his radio program how Google was actively suppressing Tulsi Gabbard search results in the United States.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsis-youtube-suppressed</ref>

After Hillary's Clinton's xenophobic smear, [[Steven Crowder]] demonstrated during his radio program how Google was actively suppressing Tulsi Gabbard search results in the United States.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsis-youtube-suppressed</ref>